Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+Phonetic\s+Alphabet\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] Phonetic Alphabet (score: 1)
Author: sbbloom69@yahoo.com (Stuart Bloom)
Date: Tue Mar 18 11:05:30 2003
Well, I see this crop up every once in a while. I guess it really doesn't matter WHAT phonetic alphbet you use, as long as you think everyone that might be listening will understand your choice of wo
/archives//html/Yaesu/2003-03/msg00030.html (8,029 bytes)

2. [Yaesu] Phonetic Alphabet (score: 1)
Author: msauve@alientech.net (msauve@alientech.net)
Date: Tue Mar 18 11:53:45 2003
At 08:05 AM 3/18/2003 -0800, Stuart Bloom wrote... Which standards body ratified this? What standard should be referenced? What authority does that standards body have over worldwide amateur radio? N
/archives//html/Yaesu/2003-03/msg00031.html (7,844 bytes)

3. [Yaesu] Phonetic Alphabet (score: 1)
Author: laurier.stonge@analog.com (Stonge, Laurier)
Date: Tue Mar 18 12:17:53 2003
Fellow hams, as a newbie that has been tagged with the label "Extra Lite" after 40 years of serious trying to be a ham (CW was my BIG bottleneck... I'm an engineer so the theory wasn't scary) I'm qui
/archives//html/Yaesu/2003-03/msg00032.html (9,118 bytes)

4. [Yaesu] Phonetic Alphabet (score: 1)
Author: on4kj@skynet.be (on4kj)
Date: Tue Mar 18 12:34:37 2003
There we go again .............. Can't say nothing else then WHOOOOPS !. Mike. What authority does that standards body have over worldwide amateur radio? associated with the military, so this is a no
/archives//html/Yaesu/2003-03/msg00033.html (8,429 bytes)

5. [Yaesu] Phonetic Alphabet (score: 1)
Author: sbbloom69@yahoo.com (Stuart Bloom)
Date: Tue Mar 18 14:00:54 2003
Well, I guess NATO's phonetic alphabet was good enough for the United Nations, since they adopted it as their RECOMMENDED standard. Specifically, the International Civil Aviation Organization (charte
/archives//html/Yaesu/2003-03/msg00036.html (7,982 bytes)

6. [Yaesu] Phonetic Alphabet (score: 1)
Author: msauve@alientech.net (msauve@alientech.net)
Date: Tue Mar 18 17:39:29 2003
At 11:00 AM 3/18/2003 -0800, Stuart Bloom wrote... That is not correct. "Use of a standard phonetic alphabet as an aid for correct station identification is encouraged;" - FCC Regulations, Section 97
/archives//html/Yaesu/2003-03/msg00040.html (7,675 bytes)

7. [Yaesu] Phonetic Alphabet (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br (Marcelo)
Date: Tue Mar 18 18:30:38 2003
Have you ever figured that some phonetics are hard for non english speakers to pronounce? Sorry for eventually not using your NATO alphabet (my country is not part of NATO anyway) and for spoiling yo
/archives//html/Yaesu/2003-03/msg00041.html (8,553 bytes)

8. [Yaesu] Phonetic Alphabet (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ)
Date: Tue Mar 18 19:37:50 2003
Wow that was fascinating - thank you very much - not on subject but very enlightening 73, K 4 Otto Jambo Florida QSO Party is April 26 & 27 - check it out at: http://www.qsl.net/fqp/
/archives//html/Yaesu/2003-03/msg00042.html (7,128 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu