Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+\.vs\.\s+TR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+\.vs\.\s+TR\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT .vs. TR (score: 1): Author: Dio <diomar@electriciti.com.spam.spam.spam> (Dio); Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 12:28:55 -0700; No, I don't want to start a holy war. I am a user of CT and like it very much thank you. I'd like to know why you like one or the other, pro's and con's. 73 DE KE6WEO THX --Dio 1106 2nd St. Suite 316; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-06/msg00009.html (7,895 bytes)
2. [ct-user] CT .vs. TR (score: 1): Author: Keith Morehouse - W9RM <blckhole@ripco.com> (Keith Morehouse - W9RM); Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 15:15:17 -0500; Yes, I like CT also - and have been an avid user since version 4. However, I broke down and bought TR at Dayton - and plan to make it my standard logging program. Why ? Because, in my opinion, CT wil; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-06/msg00010.html (8,541 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CT .vs. TR (score: 1): Author: Bob Wruble" <ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble); Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:02:11 -0700; i too was a devoted ct user from the first time it was available as is/was most of the now devoted 2-3000 TR users.......somewhere along the way ken wolf, k1ea seemed to lose interest in the k1ea/CT; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-06/msg00013.html (9,788 bytes)
4. [ct-user] CT .vs. TR (score: 1): Author: Hank Kohl <k8dd@contesting.com> (Hank Kohl); Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 02:01:43 +0100; I also like and use CT by K1EA I also like and use NA by K8CC And subscribe to both. They cover different contests along with a lot of the same contests and are very similar in operation. */ Hank Koh; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-06/msg00020.html (6,932 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]