Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+New\s+Super\s+Check\s+Partial\s+Files\s+Available\s+VER20050905\s+$5\s+Sep05$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+New\s+Super\s+Check\s+Partial\s+Files\s+Available\s+VER20050905\s+$5\s+Sep05$\s*$/: 3571 ]

Total 3571 documents matching your query.

321. Fw: [NA-User] Breakdown/Rate (score: 1): Author: k5iid@ntelos.net (Tom Horton); Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:42:10 +0000; Hey Quacks...that is whta you get for jumping the gun and trying to get an unfair advantage on us little pistols! I think you should get a 1 hour penalty.... I think your most productive hour would b; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00007.html (8,993 bytes)
322. Fw: [NA-User] Breakdown/Rate (score: 1): Author: Jim White" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:55:28 -0500; be gentile, you know that he is UTC Challenged with... the starts (say; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00008.html (10,033 bytes)
323. Fw: Fw: [NA-User] Breakdown/Rate (score: 1): Author: k7qq@netzero.net (Rex Maner); Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 04:35:50 +0100; With the conditions I had on Saturday, just take ur pick of the hr and I might loose 10 or 12 Q's. I shud have started Friday morning to make up for the conditions that U lucky dogs (even QRP's ) fro; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00009.html (11,212 bytes)
324. [NA-User] Fw: [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy (score: 1): Author: k7qq@netzero.net (Rex Maner); Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 06:52:03 +0100; QUACK's I haven't pulled mine yet but its a pain in the ASS when I screw up the clock at the start of a contest or something. and have to send bunches of e-mails to guys who don't really want my card; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00010.html (11,168 bytes)
325. [NA-User] Fw: [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy (score: 1): Author: wc4h@itis.net (Carl - WC4H); Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 07:53:46 -0500; Re-plying by e-QSL and not replying are equal for award purposes. I am a log mongrol. I log every qso I make and when I paraticipate in a contest, I import that into my general log. It's relatively e; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00011.html (12,791 bytes)
326. [NA-User] Internet packet feeds to other software (score: 1): Author: N5RP@pdq.net (Bob, N5RP); Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 09:16:50 -0500; I could not find a consolidated source of information that outlined how to get packet spots off of the Internet and have those spots fed into my NA contest software, as well as feed any other softwar; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00012.html (10,947 bytes)
327. [NA-User] NEQP (score: 1): Author: BlairBates@aol.com (BlairBates@aol.com); Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:56:02 EDT; So I don't waste time re-inventing the wheel . . . Has anyone set up a template for the upcoming NEQP (New England QSO party)? If so, is the template in the public domain? K3YD; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00013.html (6,359 bytes)
328. [NA-User] NEQP (score: 1): Author: dap14@daimlerchrysler.com (dap14@daimlerchrysler.com); Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:56:08 -0400; Supporting NEQP requires changes to the NA program itself. The problem is the location part of the exchange, which they have set up to be a combination of two letter state abbreviation and three lett; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00014.html (9,323 bytes)
329. [NA-User] FQP points (score: 1): Author: k5iid@ntelos.net (Tom Horton); Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 02:33:19 +0000; Is anyone else using NA for the FQP? My point values are tripled...instead of 1 or 2 point...it's three or six. Ideas? Otherwise just hunky dory! 73, Tom K5IID; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00015.html (6,501 bytes)
330. [NA-User] FQP points (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 00:04:26 +0000; Hmmm ... that explains my lofty score! Just recalculated my score by hand, and it doesn't jive with what NA's telling me. The Template looks OK, so don't easily see where the problem might be. Ron, W; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00016.html (6,727 bytes)
331. [NA-User] FQP points (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 06:17:46 +0000; After getting some sleep ... and recalculating the score again by hand ... NA in fact, IS, scoring FQP correctly!! I guess I AM doing better than expected! 73, Ron WD4AHZ; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00017.html (6,754 bytes)
332. [NA-User] FQP points (score: 1): Author: k8cc@comcast.net (David A. Pruett); Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 08:58:47 -0400; Aren't you forgetting the power multiplier? Its x2 for 150W and x3 for 5W. I just confirmed this from looking at the FQP rules on the Internet. Dave; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00018.html (6,816 bytes)
333. [NA-User] Thanks Dave! (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:16:17 +0000; Dave, just wanted to say thank you for your continued support of the Florida QSO Party in NA! After Saturday's break, I read all kinds of "bug reports" from CT and Writelog users (such as not allowin; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00019.html (7,057 bytes)
334. [NA-User] Thanks Dave! (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:32:17 -0400; I would like to second that Kevin (N4KM) and I used NA once again in our effort as K4FCG/M NA seemed to work great all weekend long - my only quesiotn to Ron/Dan is how do we handle VE1OP who sent MA; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00020.html (8,685 bytes)
335. [NA-User] Thanks Dave! (score: 1): Author: dap14@daimlerchrysler.com (dap14@daimlerchrysler.com); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:29:57 -0400; Ron, Thanks for the kind words. I'm pleased we can support the FQP so well. Part of this is due to the rules similarity between CQP, FQP, MQP, OQP, etc. With NA's configurable design, code does not h; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00021.html (11,328 bytes)
336. [NA-User] Thanks Dave! (score: 1): Author: dap14@daimlerchrysler.com (dap14@daimlerchrysler.com); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:07:11 -0400; Jim, A couple other suggestions to make QSO party mobiling easier for all concerned: Use your call and the county as the filename - for example: K4FCGHIL.QDF. Keep in mind that NA and most other DOS-; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-04/msg00022.html (12,235 bytes)
337. [NA-User] Colours (score: 1): Author: N5RP@pdq.net (Bob, N5RP); Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 01:05:05 +0000; Well, the version 10.56 change (or whatever) to newer/different packet/alert cluster combination sure helped me. Several things played into this particular recent discovery of my problem with the shr; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-03/msg00000.html (7,552 bytes)
338. [NA-User] Two-Radio Setup for SSB? (score: 1): Author: w8fn@attglobal.net (Randy Farmer); Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 20:34:19 -0600; I'm looking for guidance on how to set up NA for two-radio use in SSB. Late last year I acquired one of the Top Ten "DX Doubler" SO2R boxes, a product I can heartily recommend. I configured it as des; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-03/msg00001.html (7,935 bytes)
339. [NA-User] Breakdown/Rate (score: 1): Author: k7qq@netzero.net (Rex Maner); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 03:39:38 +0100; I just finished the WPX test using NA10.55 and the rate sheet for the first 24 hrs. shows no contacts ( these are shown for the second 24) and the last 24 hrs is missing. I took the .qdf file to NA10; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-03/msg00002.html (6,413 bytes)
340. [NA-User] Two-Radio Setup for SSB? (score: 1): Author: k8cc@comcast.net (k8cc); Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 22:33:48 -0500; Randy, My TopTen "DX Doubler" box does the same thing. I had not dug into the problem but what you describe is the culprit I suspected. If you look at the DX Doubler schematic you'll find that the To; /archives//html/NA-User/2002-03/msg00003.html (10,476 bytes)

Current List: 321 - 340
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]