Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[na\-user\]\s+SS\s+Database\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[na\-user\]\s+SS\s+Database\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Bill Fisher - W4AN <w4an@contesting.com> (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:04:56 -0500 (EST); Folks, I'm not a proponent of database use in a contest. Frankly, I dont believe super-check-partial is even a good thing. However, TRLog includes a database of precedents, checks, and sections. When; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00005.html (8,131 bytes)
2. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Bill Fisher - W4AN <w4an@contesting.com> (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:00:50 -0500 (EST); I'm hoping we can talk Dave in to adding the feature. But we will need a keeper of the database. Someone who collects logs from various people and builds the database. It won't be easy. 73 Bill Fishe; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00006.html (8,385 bytes)
3. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: dap14@daimlerchrysler.com (dap14@daimlerchrysler.com); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:06:41 -0500; I hate the idea of an SS database. It rewards the poor op who can't copy, in some cases he or she just accepts the defaults and takes his chances with the log-checking process. Personally, I don't be; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00007.html (9,096 bytes)
4. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Bill Fisher - W4AN <w4an@contesting.com> (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:39:43 -0500 (EST); On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 K8CC wrote on the NA Reflector: Well there is really two solutions to the database problem as I see it. 1. We (contesting community) need to convince N6TR that an SS database of ex; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00008.html (9,401 bytes)
5. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Charles W. Shaw" <n5ul@wtaccess.com (Charles W. Shaw); Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 21:39:43 +0000; Hello all, Dave said, "I hate the idea of an SS database. It rewards the poor op who can't copy . . .." I hope we don't get into this either. With the super-check of my log from CW SS, I find that th; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00009.html (9,362 bytes)
6. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Bill Fisher - W4AN <w4an@contesting.com> (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 16:53:18 -0500 (EST); I don't believe that the program should fill in the blanks. I believe it should provide you with a window of one sort or another that displays the database information. A reality check if you will.; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00010.html (8,959 bytes)
7. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Russ Connors <aa2gs@isoc.net> (Russ Connors); Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 18:37:37 -0500; The use of these databases really is ridiculous and for me changes the nature of the "contest". The contest becomes who has the best database...not the best antenna and ears. Makes me want to go find; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00011.html (9,063 bytes)
8. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: David A. Pruett" <k8cc@ix.netcom.com (David A. Pruett); Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 21:29:55 -0500; Is this what TRLog does, does it fill in the blanks? I never thought about the "A" precedence default in SS, but Chas is right - I've found myself skipping it some times. Geez...I'm not even consist; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00013.html (8,959 bytes)
9. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Matt--K7BG <aa7bg@3rivers.net> (Matt--K7BG); Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 00:10:45 -0700; copy, in with the But it does help determine the "best" poor operator. K7BG -- Submissions: na-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: na-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW: http://www.contesting.; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00014.html (8,716 bytes)
10. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 03:24:38 -0500; I'd use it if offered in NA. I'm sure we could find someone willing to do the database given the utility in NAU or whatever. I sort of agree with you...I find it a little distasteful compared to the; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00015.html (10,709 bytes)
11. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 03:29:52 -0500; I don't believe that the program should fill in the blanks. I believe it should provide you with a window of one sort or another that displays the database information. A reality check if you will. 7; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00016.html (8,833 bytes)
12. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey Yeager <jnyeager@southern.edu> (Jeffrey Yeager); Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:25:12 -0500 (EST); Is it a conflict of interest that the gentleman who writes the SS log checking software also writes the software that has all the exchange info in it??? I hope contesting doesnt become a contest of s; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00017.html (9,914 bytes)
13. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Bill Fisher - W4AN <w4an@contesting.com> (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:42:30 -0500 (EST); No it isn't. N6TR made his report public and besides that he's a stand up guy. If anything, he's been harder on his own logs in the past than he has on those of his competitors. 73 Bill -- Submission; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00018.html (8,927 bytes)
14. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Bill Fisher - W4AN <w4an@contesting.com> (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:45:11 -0500 (EST); The difference is that I don't want to get lazy and start assuming that the database is always right. I want to assume I'm always right. If the program fills it in, you WILL make more mistakes becau; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00019.html (8,781 bytes)
15. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Tim Jones <tlj@indy.net> (Tim Jones); Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 05:26:07 -0500; Bill's orginal message about having a database from SS and TR that the data is saved from what YOU copied say I had 1000 q's from the 1998 SS and I saved the check and section for stations. If I made; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00024.html (9,835 bytes)
16. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Mitchell, Tim (T.K.)" <tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim (T.K.)); Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:39:52 -0500; For what its worth here is that tact I have taken on the database debate. I do NOT want this feature. Furthermore, anyone who has this feature and thinks it will help them when they work me better th; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00027.html (9,169 bytes)
17. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey A Maass <jmaass@gcfn.org> (Jeffrey A Maass); Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 17:47:08 -0500 (EST); Hmm, if Tim sends a check in SS not corresponding to the year he was first licensed, does that invalidate every QSO he makes (since he sent an improper exchange)? What else could he change from year; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00028.html (8,308 bytes)
18. [na-user] SS Database (score: 1): Author: David A. Pruett" <k8cc@ix.netcom.com (David A. Pruett); Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:29:31 -0500; Lots of people use fake checks. "73" is popular and I've been told a certain Michigan SSer likes "55", despite the fact that he was licensed in 1967. Lessee - how about section? I've operated contes; /archives//html/NA-User/1999-03/msg00030.html (8,851 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]