Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+\[WriteLog\]\s+Erratic\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+\[WriteLog\]\s+Erratic\s+CW\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: carsten.steinhoefel@web.de (Carsten Steinhöfel); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 17:24:33 -0000; Garry, Background processes could sure be a problem, especially the printer etc. drivers which would obviously access the LPT port as well (and with higher priority then Writelog). Have you thought a; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00235.html (9,830 bytes)
2. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 18:02:45 -0000; Carsten brings up an interesting point. I don't have problems with CW keying, even with a P-133, after closing all the misc. background programs. I use a COM port, not LPT port for keying. I wonder i; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00238.html (9,645 bytes)
3. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 13:50:58 -0500; Nope - My CW thru com port works fine with simple transistor interface, even with lots of other things running, including my PC serving the internet to 3 other computers on the home network. I actua; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00241.html (9,239 bytes)
4. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: Roger Borowski" <K9RB@arrl.net (Roger Borowski); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 15:01:26 -0400; None....and never have! I can't imagine why so many go for the LPT port when you can use the same port as rig control for CW keying??? I've heard of some problems with com ports but it seems that if; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00242.html (10,340 bytes)
5. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 20:46:12 -0000; Guess that could be a possibility in some cases if you had a LPT port for keying and also hd printers installed on the same port. Some printer packages are pretty agressive. etc. higher; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00245.html (10,408 bytes)
6. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 16:19:46 -0700; _________________________________________________________ Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the reason folks want to use the LPT port for CW is that there is a conflict if you want to use RTTY FSK; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00250.html (9,584 bytes)
7. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 23:37:55 -0000; <snip> OK, you're wrong :.) My COM ports are set up as follows: COM1 - modem COM2 - Radio COM3 - Packet COM4 - PTT/CW/FSK COM5 - Acom amp Obviously, I don't use CW and FSK at the same time, so when r; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00252.html (9,713 bytes)
8. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 17:13:30 -0700; _________________________________________________________ I remember what the problem was that made me use three com ports. It was that I wanted to be able to use MMTTY as a stand alone program. It i; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00254.html (10,234 bytes)
9. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: ww3s@zoominternet.net (ww3s); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 20:48:17 -0400; And with a Rigblaster Plus you can run FSK and CW from the same port.....73; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00255.html (10,654 bytes)
10. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 20:54:24 -0400; I haven't tried it yet, but I believe one could use a single port for both CW and FSK with MMTTY. FSK = TXD, CW = DTR, PTT = RTS. Yes, MMTTY would have PTT on the "CW" line but most rigs will ignore; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00256.html (9,517 bytes)
11. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 19:43:13 -0700; _________________________________________________________ I'm using a TS-870S and apparently it's one of those that doesn't ignore it. To be specific, when it's in FSK mode and the CW jack is keyed,; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00260.html (9,132 bytes)
12. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 19:45:18 -0700; _________________________________________________________ Do you mean AFSK? Why would you need a Rigblaster for FSK or CW? Bill, W7TI; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00261.html (8,869 bytes)
13. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 06:34:17 -0400; I built the interface on the old N1RCT page and use it for CW and FSK from the same COM port (RITTY or MMTTY). Works with CT too. Note that the radio frequency control is on a DIFFERENT COM port, I d; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00263.html (9,447 bytes)
14. AW: [WriteLog] Erratic CW (score: 1): Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 07:31:04 -0400; Jim, I know that one can't control the radio, do CW and do FSK (MMTTY, etc.) all from the same port. That's why I never built the interface for FSK/CW/PTT. FSK and rig control take two ports no matte; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00264.html (9,852 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]