Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fcc\s+and\s+Vanity\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Fcc and Vanity (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@avana.net (k4sb@avana.net)
Date: Sat Oct 5 11:15:42 1996
I would like to point out a few FACTs regarding this current foul up and perhaps make a suggestion or two. I do regard this as contest related as I think an individuals's call is of utmost importance
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00039.html (22,894 bytes)

2. Fcc and Vanity (score: 1)
Author: WD8AUB@IX.NETCOM.COM (Douglas L. Klein)
Date: Sun Oct 6 11:13:44 1996
<<Big Snip>> Once again, I find myself trying to set at least one bad "fact" straight for you Ed. I personally know the person who handles the FOIA requests for another government office and I have p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00041.html (14,220 bytes)

3. Fcc and Vanity (score: 1)
Author: BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com (BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com)
Date: Sun Oct 6 15:13:01 1996
Isn't NN3SI the call for the Smithsonian Institute club station? Jim, K1ZX Just curious... How thoroughly do other state QSO Parties check their logs? How much evidence of error do you require before
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00043.html (15,523 bytes)

4. Fcc and Vanity (score: 1)
Author: BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com (BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com)
Date: Sun Oct 6 20:19:16 1996
Isn't NN3SI the call for the Smithsonian Institute club station? Jim, K1ZX Just a quick addendum/errata on my RTTY sprINT aanouncement posted a few days ago. This note was a repost/reminder of one po
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00045.html (7,421 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu