Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*KT\-34A\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*KT\-34A\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: Jay <d7507@microagewny.com> (Jay); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:33 2005; Hello Everyone, I am considering A KLM KT-34A tribander and would like your input. I live in a rural township where we have wind gusts at or above 50 mph a few times a year. I am concerned about wind; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00447.html (7,242 bytes)
2. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed Feb 21 10:46:11 1996; a rural >township where we have wind gusts at or above 50 mph a few times a year. I am >concerned about wind survival and performance at 50 ft. The KLM KT34A is a reasonable performer. The wind survi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00522.html (7,861 bytes)
3. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed Feb 21 12:14:34 1996; Hiya, Pete -- QSL your comments. I've installed a couple of them myself and they sure are easy to assemble and install. Their light weight has positive implications for wind and rotator loading. The; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00527.html (7,664 bytes)
4. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed Feb 21 13:14:50 1996; Hiya, Jack -- The original quiery was only about the KT34A, not the bigger XA version. With a 16 foot boom, it will play similarly to other tribanders of similar boom length (since gain is a function; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00530.html (8,183 bytes)
5. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed Feb 21 15:10:07 1996; Hiya, Bill -- About 10 or 15 years ago there was a pretty good comparison of a bunch of multi-band antennas and they were ranked in 5-6 different categories. Let me know if you would like a copy of t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00533.html (8,464 bytes)
6. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed Feb 21 16:32:38 1996; Okay, Pete - Your plan to use the 40M element is a good one; the buzz is that even the single element for 40 works well. To be honest with you, it would have to be some sort of emergency for me to re; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00536.html (8,996 bytes)
7. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: Charles H. Harpole" <harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:34 2005; I live about 5 miles from the Sommer Antenna plant, i.e., Mr. Sommer's house and workshop behind it. He's a very private man. But, if I can be of assistance to anyone because of my location, let me k; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00546.html (7,588 bytes)
8. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: Charles H. Harpole" <harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:34 2005; You gotta be kiddin! Select a 34A or XA over a TH-7, no way! 73, K4VUD; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00548.html (7,285 bytes)
9. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: Jeff Singer <wa2syn@li.net> (Jeff Singer); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:34 2005; -- Jay - I've had two Kt34's, one a kt-34XA. I just love these antennas. In particular, the "XA" will give you the flattest SWR you will ever see across every band from top to bottom (and then some),; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00560.html (9,472 bytes)
10. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu Feb 22 02:15:34 1996; Ed -- Thanks for your input and insight. Of course there is the variability that you mentioned. I have posed the trap loss question to several well known antenna designers and have never received a d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00573.html (9,097 bytes)
11. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: Mr. Brett Graham" <bagraham@HK.Super.NET (Mr. Brett Graham); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:34 2005; K7LXC said: I'm sorry but I don't have any experience with the Fritzell antennas that you mentioned. A coupla years before I moved over here, VS6 got hit by a particularly nasty typhoon. Of all the a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00579.html (7,800 bytes)
12. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: David_B_Curtis@ccm11.sc.intel.com (David_B_Curtis@ccm11.sc.intel.com); Date: Thu Feb 22 09:15:27 1996; de wa2syn: twice?? As I recall from several years ago when I had one, the instructions said to allow 8 hours for a KT-34XA, and it took me more like 4X, working carefully. ("Measure twice, cut once",; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00587.html (7,843 bytes)
13. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: kf3p@cais.cais.com (Tyler Stewart) (Tyler Stewart); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:35 2005; Well, I dont know if I'd defend KLM too hard...they've had some QC problems since they were sold the last time, however I'll reserve judgement since they seem to be making some improvements. I agree; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00630.html (10,730 bytes)
14. Re[2]: KT-34A (score: 1): Author: junger@mtn.er.usgs.gov (John Unger) (John Unger); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:35 2005; I think that is a real problem with the KT34-XA, Dave. My "normal" KT34-A seems almost perfectly balanced, wind-load wise, around the mast. In fact, in high winds it seems happiest with the boom perp; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00636.html (7,266 bytes)
15. KT-34A (score: 1): Author: 71034.3544@CompuServe.COM (Wayne Wright); Date: Wed Apr 21 23:02:39 1993; Mine has been up since July, 1985 and I've never done any maintenance, and never even thought of doing any. I can't say as much for the Ham IV that turns it. Both were bought new at the same time. Bu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00140.html (6,038 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]