Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*No\s+subject\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*No\s+subject\s*$/: 333 ]

Total 333 documents matching your query.

181. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri Mar 19 15:14:00 1993; I had lunch with K1AR today (he was in town to close on the sale of his NH house (no turning back now...). We discussed the half-time debate. If such a category is established, he's thinking of going; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00249.html (7,985 bytes)
182. No subject (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Fri Mar 19 16:57:33 1993; The first two creative suggestions to come out of this debate since the orignal 24 hour proposal were N6TR's to sponsor a 24 hour listing through NCJ (with volunteer labor) and K1AR's suggestion, rel; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00257.html (8,059 bytes)
183. No subject (score: 1): Author: george554@austin.relay.ucm.org (george554@austin.relay.ucm.org); Date: Fri Mar 26 08:29:47 1993; Feild Day is *not* an contest, it *is* an operating event.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00304.html (7,070 bytes)
184. No subject (score: 1): Author: price@cod.nosc.mil (James N. Price); Date: Fri Mar 26 08:31:19 1993; -- Well, I think FD qualifies as a 'contest' by most metrics. The only element lacking is that there are no awards for first place, etc. But we make QSOs, earn points, AND get listed IN ORDER from bi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00308.html (7,542 bytes)
185. No subject (score: 1): Author: george554@austin.relay.ucm.org (george554@austin.relay.ucm.org); Date: Thu Apr 1 12:26:14 1993; score collection a while back Trey asked me if i would collect all the scres for the contests - and then post them to CQ-CONTEST. i said that i would. SO if you have any scores after a contest send t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00007.html (7,965 bytes)
186. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Wed Apr 7 11:41:00 1993; It's getting way too complicated. Here's another angle to complicate it more.. Most proponents of part-time contesting can't/won't operate "the full 48". How about the ultimate in time-reduction with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00039.html (7,790 bytes)
187. No subject (score: 1): Author: george554@austin.relay.ucm.org (george554@austin.relay.ucm.org); Date: Wed Apr 7 20:59:36 1993; WPX SCORE RUMORS single op all band high power KM1H 3002/912 7.03M kq2m WN4KKN/6 3022/759 5.80M K3ZO 5.19M KM5X NI8L 2158/811 3.80M AB5KD 1748/666 2.34M wb5vzl 24 hours KF2O 1365/647 2.17M KE9I 1488/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00052.html (8,394 bytes)
188. No subject (score: 1): Author: george554@austin.relay.ucm.org (george554@austin.relay.ucm.org); Date: Wed Apr 14 22:35:37 1993; wpx scores -- 4-14-93 WPX SCORE RUMORS single op all band high power KM1H 3002/912 7.03M kq2m WN4KKN/6 3022/759 5.80M K3ZO 5.19M KM5X 2274/769 4.35M NI8L 2158/811 3.80M AB5KD 1748/666 2.34M wb5vzl 24; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00100.html (8,374 bytes)
189. No subject (score: 1): Author: george554@austin.relay.ucm.org (george554@austin.relay.ucm.org); Date: Wed Apr 14 22:31:23 1993; the problem i have with the ja ops is that they all seem to call with the last three letters of their call! why why why? i agree that the f8 stuff is just annoying -- check country is the thing that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00101.html (6,961 bytes)
190. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Wed Apr 21 11:01:00 1993; Here's a new potential flame war. Let's try to keep it civil, though. Some contest results recently came in the mail. One station (who shall remain unidentified) won an award. His score qualified him; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00126.html (7,863 bytes)
191. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Wed Apr 21 18:23:00 1993; The responses (both on- and off-reflector) have been interesting. I'll try to summarize at some point after Dayton (where, I'm sure, more gasoline will be thrown on the fire...). However.... I'm not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00134.html (7,295 bytes)
192. No subject (score: 1): Author: george554@austin.relay.ucm.org (george554@austin.relay.ucm.org); Date: Wed Apr 21 20:22:57 1993; the latest and greatest wpx scores -- 4-21-93 WPX SCORE RUMORS single op all band high power KM1H 3002/912 7.03M kq2m WN4KKN/6 3022/759 5.80M K3ZO 5.19M KM5X 2274/769 4.35M NI8L 2158/811 3.80M AB5KD; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00141.html (8,448 bytes)
193. No subject (score: 1): Author: george554@austin.relay.ucm.org (george554@austin.relay.ucm.org); Date: Mon May 31 19:39:45 1993; early wpx scores single op all band high power KF3P 2050/660 3.98M K5MR 1965/685 3.80M N6TV 1700/600 3.30M est. AA5DX 1766/662 2.60M N6AZE 81/71 13k single op all band low power 9V1YC 2316/575 3.35M; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00000.html (7,130 bytes)
194. No subject (score: 1): Author: 61954@ravel.udel.edu (David J Blowman); Date: Fri May 7 22:12:00 1993; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00063.html (6,578 bytes)
195. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Tue May 11 17:07:00 1993; This is the right group to ask... Who has the biggest ham antennas? I've recently been asked that question, and I know a bunch of big ones out there, but who's got *THE BIGGEST*? I guess it's really; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00074.html (7,439 bytes)
196. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Thu May 13 16:43:00 1993; The Email system here croaked for most of May 12. If anyone sent me a message regarding BIG ANTENNAS, please try again. I also missed Randy's message about 100W contests. Seems to me that 100W would; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00093.html (7,289 bytes)
197. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri May 14 10:31:00 1993; I thought everyone would be interested in this response re big antennas... I'm still collecting inputs - keep 'em coming. So far all the big ones have been domestic (except for TI4CF's 75M array of 4; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00097.html (7,829 bytes)
198. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri May 14 13:19:00 1993; I did NOT put WB1HBB up to the message he posted. Honest. I'm curious, though...how many 'little guns' out there on the reflector want the top ops at the top (read:biggest antenna) stations to turn o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00101.html (7,259 bytes)
199. No subject (score: 1): Author: martin.zurn@jrc.it (Martin ZURN); Date: Mon May 17 15:20:17 1993; AGCW-DL ACTIVITY WEEK 1993: 24th of may '93 to 28th of may '93 Time: Mon 00.00 UTC thru Fri 24.00 UTC. Frequencies: HF: 1,8 MHz to 28 MHz, including WARC-bands. V/UHF: 144 MHz to 430 MHz. Operation:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00124.html (8,119 bytes)
200. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri May 21 10:42:00 1993; I am in Cheers overload. Here in the Boston TV market, we've been deluged with Cheers interviews, Cheers promos, Cheers ads, and I'VE HAD IT UP TO HERE!!!!! AND IF I HEAR THAT DAMNED SONG AGAIN, SOME; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00140.html (7,391 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]