Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rohn\s+HDBX\-48\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rohn\s+HDBX\-48\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1): Author: Gene.Smith@mailhost.bellhow.com (Gene Smith); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 12:28:09 -0500 (EST); Who out there has information or an opinion on the Rohn series HDBX-48. This is a 48' self supporting tower. I am considering putting up this tower at my QTH in Medina, OH (Medina County). I'll be pu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00059.html (8,148 bytes)
2. Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1): Author: ejensen@nmsu.edu (Ed Jensen); Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 13:15:52 -0600; Hi Gene, These are extremely stout towers that stay up under rediculous overloads. I had a BX40, much weaker than the HDBX series, with a TH3 on it. No problems. A friend has an HBX56 with KLM34XA, a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00060.html (8,800 bytes)
3. Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 17:56:31 -0500; Hi, Gene -- First things first. Medina County is a 70 MPH wind speed zone. That's the lowest that the TIA-222 gives so you shouldn't have any big wind problems to worry about. BTW, the Rohn calculati; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00061.html (10,801 bytes)
4. Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1): Author: blackj@agcs.com (blackj@agcs.com); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 16:29:17 -0700; Gene, I have a hdbx40 that I installed in 1990. I have a klm KT-34a on top. I dug a hole about 4.5 x 4.5 feet and 5 ft deep for the base ( that size was in the permit application which was based on a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00063.html (9,798 bytes)
5. Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1): Author: Darrell_Upson@pa.xerox.com (Darrell_Upson@pa.xerox.com); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 11:33:55 PST; Gene, I currently have a 56 foot version of that tower with a KT34XA two feet above it. I CANNOT recommend this combination. My tower is somewhat protected from the wind by high trees and terrain. Bu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00066.html (9,699 bytes)
6. Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1): Author: crb@nanoteq.co.za (Chris R. Burger); Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 08:49:52 +200; I'm afraid they do. You won't need a drill, though. They pull out of the metal, and you merely need to cut them off with a beefy pair of side cutters. Chris R. Burger ZS6EZ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00068.html (7,770 bytes)
7. Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1): Author: Bill_H._Jackson@notes.up.com (Bill H. Jackson); Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 08:54:30 -0500; Gene, I used a HDBX48 with a 8 ft. mast, KT-34A 4el tribander and 11 element 2m yagi above that for many years on the very windy high plains of western Nebraska with no problems. However, I junked bo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00071.html (11,247 bytes)
8. Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1): Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten); Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 10:55:23 EST; K1VR opines: When I've worked on X brace towers, I've always worn steel shank hiking boots with a Vibram (tm) sole. Helps immensely. But they are still painful to work on. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00075.html (7,919 bytes)
9. Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1): Author: ejensen@nmsu.edu (Ed Jensen); Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 13:44:58 -0600; Hi Mike, Lots of places sell it but I found the best price to be from National Tower. They have a good price plus they pay part of the shipping. They advertise in QST. Per stock design, HDBX will go; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00158.html (7,690 bytes)
10. Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:06:24 -0500; The BX design is made in Canada under the Delhi name. They still make all the big straight sections. Lots of VE's use them to 90 feet or more. They're usually guyed so I don't have any idea what they; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00164.html (8,002 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]