Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+27\,5m\s+vertikal\s+titanex\s+ore\s+22m\s+toploaded\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+27\,5m\s+vertikal\s+titanex\s+ore\s+22m\s+toploaded\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160m 27,5m vertikal titanex ore 22m toploaded? (score: 1): Author: dl8yhrfrank--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:34:46 -0400; Hi all im running a 27,5m high titanex v160hd.....looking out for improvments.. radialfield is out of 100+radials between 5 and 20m long.. think about 3 options 1 ?? keep it as it is 2 ?? make it sho; /archives//html/Topband/2015-06/msg00014.html (7,421 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160m 27,5m vertikal titanex ore 22m toploaded? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 21:11:14 +0200; The best improvement will be with a second vertical for a phased array. Second best will be a higher vertical. Making it shorter is a bad idea. 73 Peter Hi all im running a 27,5m high titanex v160hd.; /archives//html/Topband/2015-06/msg00015.html (8,075 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]