Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 160m 27,5m vertikal titanex ore 22m toploaded?

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 160m 27,5m vertikal titanex ore 22m toploaded?
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 21:11:14 +0200
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
The best improvement will be with a second vertical for a phased array.
Second best will be a higher vertical.
Making it shorter is a bad idea.

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
dl8yhrfrank--- via Topband
Sent: Freitag, 5. Juni 2015 20:35
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: 160m 27,5m vertikal titanex ore 22m toploaded?

 

 Hi all
im running a 27,5m high titanex v160hd.....looking out for improvments..
radialfield is out of 100+radials between 5 and 20m long..
think about 3 options

1 ?? keep it as it is

2 ?? make it shorter arround 22m and set 2 10m long wires ore??? ? ? ?? ???
??? ? maybe? 15 m? 45 degrees down as top load

3?? take? the 2 upper sections of the titanex away and fix a 8m? 
? ?? spiderbeam pole inside? so i will get a total high of 32m

ore maybe a shorted delta loop matched with a coil in resonance?

My sapce is vy limited here in the village and maybe someone has tested
differend setups in practice...anny infos vy welcome
i saw many simulations in the web but i like more to get a info from?
someone who tryed realy and know the result real..


best 73
Frank
DL8YHR

??????????? 

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>