Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Coupla\s+things\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:04:13 -0500
- Last night during the CQ160 test it was the quietest night in many weeks as regards local QRM from the electrical noise that has been plaguing me. The band seemed very open to EU and some SA statio
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00211.html (9,332 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:46:01 -0600
Yes! What in the heck was that? He sounded like a UFO from Mars or something. I heard him many times (never did copy his call) and never figured out what was causing that odd noise on his signal. Tha
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00218.html (7,531 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:46:58 -0500
Hi Gary, The old saying of "...All's fair in love & war" applies here, I'm afraid! "bullying" just goes with the turf, & I will admit that non-practitioners DO have quite a "learning curve" to go thr
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00219.html (11,377 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:23:40 +0000
I didn't notice the keyclicks so bad, but what did bother me was one local who had an incredible amount of (?) phase noise (it was keyed broadband noise plus whiny synth noise) up and down from his v
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00222.html (7,723 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 10:50:00 -0800
The broad signals out here on the left coast this weekend were W6BH, W6NV, and AC6DD. The other big guns mostly use K3s, and are a lot cleaner. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00223.html (8,145 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:06:47 -0500
I heard a local New England signal today that sounded like auroral scatter but just worked him and didn't play with the Hi-Z RX antenna & just left it in one place depending on time & DX. Might have
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00225.html (9,095 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:06:47 -0500
Heyya Eddie, Oh, I can be a genuine SOB, I have witnesses... I just would never interrupt the DX from reading the J in someones call when the DX is obviously working that person and nobody else. To p
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00226.html (11,784 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Woods <jmwooods@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:35:06 -0800 (PST)
To this end, if my signal (W0ODS) was offensive in any way kindly let me know (Off-list, please). Saturday night I was using a new homebrew amplifier, just completed that  afternoon.  Needless to say
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00228.html (8,160 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:53:30 -0800
The broad signals out here on the left coast this weekend were W6BH, W6NV, Blown call by me -- it was K6NV who was broad. W6NV was with a bunch of guys activating N6RZ, in a memorial tribute to Dave.
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00229.html (8,188 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Joe K2UF" <joe@k2uf.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:58:52 -0500
Folks, Thanks to all those who gave me a call/QSO this weekend. I apologize to those that I could not hear from my suburban lot (very noisy and only a distorted inv "V"). What is the 'official' rule
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00233.html (8,680 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:57:30 -0500
To this end, if my signal (W0ODS) was offensive in any way kindly let me know (Off-list, please). >>> I hope everyone attempts to contact a person in private first, and only uses public means when no
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00236.html (9,191 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:54:11 -0500
Hi Tom et al, Alas & alack, that sort of thing simply does NOT happen in to-day's Topband world... Far too often, the unwitting "perpetrator" is often lambasted & skewered--behind his back, of course
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00239.html (10,575 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:40:02 -0500
Would that EVERY such case be treated in the same manner, Tom, exactly as you describe & as I acted upon--but sadly, it does not. And it leaves so-called "transgressors" feeling hurt, angry, dis-enfr
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00242.html (10,155 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:58:40 -0500
Hi Tom, I agree 100% with the idea of of somehow having a central repository of click ailments & cures: that would offer a struggling newbie to the ailment a quick & ready source of ideas & possible
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00243.html (10,076 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:55:23 +0000
Bob (K6NV) and I were having a off-list discussion and it got me wondering.... I heard some bad signals on the east coast here, but nothing memorable that I would describe as having keyclicks. I thin
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00246.html (9,340 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:15:15 +0000 (UTC)
I thought the proper way of indicating clicks is with the signal report - 579k. I haven't heard this used in years. If the offender gets's this signal report it may give him a clue something is amiss
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00248.html (9,315 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:45:37 -0500
I thought the proper way of indicating clicks is with the signal report - 579k. I haven't heard this used in years. No one does that now, and they especially will not do it in a contest. Remember all
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00249.html (9,391 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:03:09 -0500
As I usually do S&P in contests, I was tuning from 1.8 and going up, then repeating when there were no more CW signals. It's certainly possible there might be artifacts in this K3 but I wasn't using
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00252.html (10,385 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:41:40 -0800
Absolutely -- clicks can be generated in the RX by a noise blanker, and by overload of a receiver. And yes, a noise blanker that samples a broadband signal and uses it to cancel or gate noise will ma
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00253.html (10,137 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:26:44 -0500
And I DID contact each of the guys whose calls I cited during the contest. In fact, I contacted about this issue two years ago when he was making a mess in the JA window during the winter Stew, and t
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00254.html (11,440 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu