Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT8\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Donald Moth via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:03:35 -0400
There was no thrill in the first FT8 contact I made  like the one I received when I worked W1BB using a Central Electronics 20A and a homebrew amp using 4 6AG7 tubes in grounded grid and an inverted
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00117.html (7,585 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Hans Hjelmström <sm6cvx@hjelmstrom.se>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:18:44 +0200
Correct Don/W2MPK A separate digital dxcc for FT8/JT65 should make it.These contacts no good for the other band/CW/SSB/Mixed awards. Just a separate one. BUT the official at arrl refused to even thin
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00121.html (8,120 bytes)

3. Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 07:34:10 -0700
Great post Steve - you put into words a concern that I am sure many of us share. First off - as manager of this fine list - let's all be careful and not let the discussion get out of hand. Respect ot
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00125.html (8,877 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:43:18 -0600
Why do you care how I get DXCC?  It is my award.  I am not competing against you for DXCC.  I can choose to include or exclude any contact I want for DXCC.  These awards are individual.  The only rea
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00128.html (9,245 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:42:58 -0500
Very well said indeed. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00129.html (9,678 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: S57AD <mirko.s57ad@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:48:29 +0200
Amen! 73, Mirko S57AD -- Mirko S57AD _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00130.html (9,726 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Ian_Wade_G3NRW via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:05:38 +0100
I just stumbled across this thread, and I understand many of the opinions expressed here. But one point that I don't think anyone has mentioned: the OP lives in the middle of nowhere in Western Austr
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00132.html (11,273 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:15:19 -0600
We will continue to see more and more of this as the cities expand and people are more inclined to live in the cities as the younger generation is.    FT8 or other modes made ham radio possible where
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00135.html (9,472 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Terry Sims via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:23:26 -0400
Guys, I still remember those who said the "Dick Bash" books that hams said would ruin our hobby. Now the ARRL provides you the same information as "Dick Bash". Then it was the "No Code" exams that wa
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00154.html (8,254 bytes)

10. Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:05:26 -0700
Pure and simpleNo skill, no thrill. n7dd Sent by Larry _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00158.html (7,667 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:56:51 -0700
On 10/25/2017 7:03 AM, Donald Moth via Topband wrote: There was no thrill in the first FT8 contact I made  like the one I received when I worked W1BB using a Central Electronics 20A and a homebrew am
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00164.html (8,537 bytes)

12. Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Dan Bookwalter via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 21:42:27 +0000 (UTC)
I have been reading this thread all afternoon... I can see all sides of the issue... I am an avid CW op , but , my current situation prohibits me from putting up any antennas that are even reasonable
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00169.html (8,255 bytes)

13. Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Greg Chartrand via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:37:51 +0000 (UTC)
Dear moderator.... enough is enough! BTW since the discussion started, the FT8 activity has really picked up!! Greg -- Greg Chartrand - W7MY Richland, WA. W7MY Home Page: http://webpages.charter.net/
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00244.html (8,241 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: S57AD <mirko.s57ad@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:49:35 +0200
I know Yaesu FT707, but am not aware of FT8 :D 73, Mirko, S57AD 2017-10-27 14:37 GMT+02:00 Greg Chartrand via Topband < topband@contesting.com>: -- Mirko S57AD _________________ Topband Reflector Arc
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00245.html (8,408 bytes)

15. Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: "Craig Clark" <jcclark@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:44:34 -0500
2. Re: FT8 vs other modes This discussion has been fascinating for the breadth and depth of opinions. The fundamental fact however is that this is a hobby with a wide range of options. FT8 will not b
/archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00066.html (6,904 bytes)

16. Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: "Ross Johnson" <randljohnson@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 09:50:28 +0000
Interesting reading, this proves to me beyond dough at least some cw operators feel they are superior and any other means of communication is below them. I passed the cw test here in 1976 but rarely
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00002.html (7,998 bytes)

17. Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: "Ross Johnson" <randljohnson@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 19:03:53 +0000
Roger your lack understanding surprises me , and others here. Like your station mine only hears what it hears. Ft8 users are not all connected via the net. So its interesting to see on cluster wot ot
/archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00067.html (6,794 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 16:29:28 -0600
It is just another FT8 bashing post.  It is why we had to create another list.  I just set up a new filter so I won't be bothered by trolls. W0MU Like your station mine only hears what it hears. Ft8
/archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00071.html (7,534 bytes)

19. Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: "Ross Johnson" <randljohnson@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:33:41 +0000
Please think about this , I live on a 600 square metre section. My inverted L with K2AV radial is only 10 metres high. Land is expensive here. In 6 years I have worked 98 countries on top band and we
/archives//html/Topband/2023-11/msg00095.html (7,256 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Rod Mackintosh <rod.zl3nw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:18:56 +1300
Well done Ross. A real credit to you and I look forward to hearing when you two more countries on 160m. 73 Rod ZL3NW <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=
/archives//html/Topband/2023-11/msg00097.html (8,157 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu