Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+for\s+TX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+for\s+TX\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted L for TX (score: 1): Author: ws9v at royell.net (WS9V); Date: Fri Mar 28 08:39:39 2003; Hi I installed an inverted L antenna exactly like the one in the Antenna Compenduim that AC7A describes. It has a 50ft vertical section an 148ft 1" horizontal section with a slight bit of taper may d; /archives//html/Topband/2003-03/msg00069.html (7,882 bytes)
2. Topband: Inverted L for TX (score: 1): Author: ac7a at earthlink.net (Thomas Kuehl); Date: Fri Mar 28 23:50:44 2003; Hello Skip, Couldn't help but notice your message. I have used capacitors made from coaxial cable in several of my antenna designs and haven't had any problems. My current 160-20 meter, multi-band ve; /archives//html/Topband/2003-03/msg00070.html (8,996 bytes)
3. Fw: Topband: Inverted L for TX (score: 1): Author: jerryandgail at earthlink.net (Jerry T Dowell); Date: Sat Mar 29 09:19:51 2003; Your trouble may be that the MFJ259 usually will give erroneous readings on 160M because of BC station pickup on the antenna. That meter is not useable at my QTH on any 160M antenna. I have heard tha; /archives//html/Topband/2003-03/msg00071.html (6,972 bytes)
4. Fw: Topband: Inverted L for TX (score: 1): Author: kimba at sprint.ca (Bert Barry); Date: Sat Mar 29 11:13:26 2003; I have had this problem with ALL soldid state instruments used on my 160m antenna. There is a brute-force solution - use a GR-1606 bridge. These are available at some flea markets. I got one at Dayto; /archives//html/Topband/2003-03/msg00072.html (7,527 bytes)
5. Fw: Topband: Inverted L for TX (score: 1): Author: k8mn at earthlink.net (Dave Heil); Date: Sat Mar 29 16:23:53 2003; Just to echo what Jerry writes, I had a terrible time getting a borrowed '259 to give good 160m readings in Helsinki. Using my own meter in Tanzania, I still observed 160m readings which were off by; /archives//html/Topband/2003-03/msg00073.html (7,655 bytes)
6. Fw: Topband: Inverted L for TX (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat Mar 29 16:23:54 2003; readings on useable If you have a problem with RFI, it is antenna size (system) related....it is not related at all to the dial setting of the analyzer. The problem centers around the fact virtually; /archives//html/Topband/2003-03/msg00074.html (7,679 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]