Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+question\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted L question (score: 1): Author: ea5by at galiana.org (Tony EA5BY); Date: Sat Feb 1 14:14:10 2003; I will put up an inverted L for 160 meters. And I will use a vacuum variable at the base. Seems that 250pf will do ok but, how many volts? I will use a 2KW amplifier. Many thanks for your help in adv; /archives//html/Topband/2003-02/msg00007.html (6,533 bytes)
2. Topband: Inverted L question (score: 1): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sat Feb 1 21:23:15 2003; "I will put up an inverted L for 160 meters. And I will use a vacuum variable at the base. Seems that 250pf will do ok but, how many volts? I will use a 2KW amplifier." == An inverted-L that is 100 f; /archives//html/Topband/2003-02/msg00009.html (6,828 bytes)
3. Topband: Inverted L question (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat Feb 1 21:23:16 2003; The same voltage rating rule applies in a gamma match capacitor. http://www.w8ji.com/omega_and_gama_matching.htm Just read the gamma capacitor part. It works the same.; /archives//html/Topband/2003-02/msg00011.html (6,754 bytes)
4. Topband: inverted L question (score: 1): Author: k1my@msn.com (k1my); Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:30:10 -0700; I am working on plans to put up an inverted L for 160 and have a few very basic questions. The L will be 100 feet vertical and about 100 feet horizontal or so. 1. Is longer than 100 feet horizontal b; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00161.html (7,049 bytes)
5. Topband: inverted L question (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:06:02 -0800; "I am working on plans to put up an inverted L for 160 and have a few very basic questions. The L will be 100 feet vertical and about 100 feet horizontal or so." "1. Is longer than 100 feet horizonta; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00166.html (8,201 bytes)
6. Topband: inverted L question (score: 1): Author: herbs@vitelcom.net (Herbert Schoenbohm); Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 18:10:22 -0500; Bruce, The longer you make your horizontal run the worse things get with respect to a low radiation angle and wasted power skyward. My suggestion for an inverted L is to fold back the top horizontal; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00168.html (7,326 bytes)
7. Topband: inverted L question (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:31:55 -0600; ...SNIP... I just helped install an "L" at a friend's station a couple of weeks ago. 125' gave the same results. We just cut the top section quite long, trimmed until the reactive component matched t; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00170.html (7,617 bytes)
8. TopBand: inverted L question (score: 1): Author: ko5d@juno.com (JOHN M WEBB); Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 13:45:05 EST; Well I am still working on a tower match,now dawn at abt 60' level,but its getting better.After reading up on gamma matches and doing some re-scaling I think it will fall at the 47-55 ft' level.But i; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00429.html (7,100 bytes)
9. TopBand: inverted L question (score: 1): Author: rlake@top.monad.net (Randy Lake); Date: Fri, 30 May 97 07:21:31 PDT; I took my inv.L down when we put up the new tower and I am thinking of putting it back up but on the new tower. The new tower sits up on a ridge of ledge and is 93' of 25g with TH-6 's at 95 and 60'.; /archives//html/Topband/1997-05/msg00100.html (7,296 bytes)
10. Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: Scott Meister <aztec@pobox.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:08:19 -0500; First year on Top Band and I have a question regarding my inverted L. I now have it 55 foot vertical with the remainder horizontal with elevated radials. It works well, but the neighbors will not be; /archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00019.html (7,173 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:38:48 -0700; Scott, let's compare the radiation resistance of the three antennas at 1.8 MHz. 55' x 82' Inverted-L is 16 ohms 100' x 36' Inverted-L with the 36' wire sloping downward at 45 deg is 28 ohms 100' base; /archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00030.html (7,387 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: "Mel Crichton" <kj9c@iquest.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:36:10 -0500; By all means make the vertical portion as tall as possible, even if the horizontal part slopes downward a bit. My 90 footer is really an "inverted J" over a hickory tree with the horizontal part slop; /archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00032.html (7,566 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:18:30 -0500; Given that you have the 70-90 vertical rise as a given (not in play as maybe or maybe not), what the shape of your L will do to improve/worsen your signal will be overwhelmingly swamped (not close at; /archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00033.html (8,893 bytes)
14. Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: "Lloyd Korb" <k8dio@roadrunner.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:07:01 -0400; Hello, I have used an Inverted L, on 160 meters, for many years and have always been curious if I am okay with my present spacing. The spacing between the vertical portion of the L and my 60 foot tow; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00162.html (6,918 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 06:06:32 -0400; Hi, Lloyd, Using an L with the vertical running next to a tower like that means that your tower is FULLY coupled to the L as if they were both transformer windings. The principal determination of per; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00163.html (9,317 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: "Mike(W5UC)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 06:55:39 -0500; Good Morning Lloyd & All: You have described my 160 & 80 meter antennas almost exactly. The vertical part of my L is about 3 feet away from the tower at the top, and approximately 2 feet away at the; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00165.html (9,321 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:09:33 -0400; Mike, You would be much better off by feeding the tower with a shunt or cage feed. As K2AV so accurately pointed out...an inverted "L" supported by a metal tower is not the answer for an efficient sy; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00166.html (8,595 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: "Mike(W5UC)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:36:57 -0500; Good Morning Herb; In years past, when I was living about 30 miles north of Dallas, I had a shunt fed tower, and it worked very well. However, when I tried the same configuration here, I got my fanny; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00167.html (8,961 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:05:49 -0500; --cut-- Hi Mike and the Group.... Sounds like mine as well with the exception of the 80 meter wire and fewer radials. Which concerns me a bit because I had considered loading the tower after I put it; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00169.html (8,907 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: Inverted L Question (score: 1): Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:16:57 -0700 (PDT); I have been playing with and reading about inverted L, and verticals Since November 2011. 狢 had very little experience with them before that time. I have the feed point mounded next to the tower whe; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00178.html (9,307 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]