Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+K6STI\s+low\s+noise\s+receive\s+loop\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:10:39 -0600
Has anyone employed that K6STI receive antenna? It doesn't equal a Beverage, for sure, BUT - for a small footprint area it looks interesting. I'd think it wouldn't matter if one used 450 ohm ladder l
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00046.html (6,964 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:59:11 -0400
Has anyone employed that K6STI receive antenna? It doesn't equal a Beverage, for sure, BUT - for a small footprint area it looks interesting. I think you will find that loop a good example of a syste
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00058.html (8,085 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:38:35 -0600
Well, there is no "modeling" associated with this effort, Tom - they just "did it".....built it, tuned it and used it! I've attached the article for perusal, if interested....Jim R. _________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00064.html (8,444 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:52:59 -0400
Well, there is no "modeling" associated with this effort, Tom - they just "did it".....built it, tuned it and used it! I've attached the article for perusal, if interested....Jim R. I saw the origina
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00067.html (8,072 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:10:48 -0600
Great - I appreciate you revisiting the article....I am going to try it in a week or so. Jim R. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00072.html (8,829 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 15:31:03 -0400 (EDT)
"there is no "modeling" associated with this effort." Jim, I took a look at the article today and also threw together a basic (simple) EZNEC model and my generated elevation pattern closely resembles
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00074.html (8,623 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:43:13 -0600
And, in my case, Don, I simply need to put up an antenna that's: a) more efficient than my vertical and b) fits within the confines of my property....having any noise cancelling or nulling is a plus
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00076.html (9,682 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:22:33 -0700
And, in my case, Don, I simply need to put up an antenna that's: a) more efficient than my vertical and b) fits within the confines of my property....having any noise cancelling or nulling is a plus
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00090.html (9,407 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:41:28 -0700
If you try the K6STI low noise loop please let us know your results. I have tried a number of low noise receiving loops, currently am playing with a Waller flag. The K6STI loop is very interesting, I
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00102.html (8,869 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: Arthur Delibert <radio75a3@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 22:45:04 -0400
Maybe I'm the only guy on the list that actually built one of these antennas. I used it for 90-meter BC DX, and the results were spectacular. Background noise dropped to a very low level, and I could
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00107.html (11,123 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:41:10 -0400
Hi, I dunno about Jim's real estate but a full size 80 meter dipole would extend off from my lot. Somebody else in a different thread concerning this pointed out that those blessed with large territo
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00111.html (9,532 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:29:08 +1300
I tried one of these back in the late 90's, while active as ZS5K. Sure it cancelled most of the noise arriving from the horizon, but, then, most of the DX comes from there as well. I never heard anyt
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00114.html (8,553 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 01:12:21 -0700
Jim, When I first got on 160 I put one up at the urging of W6KUT (SK) back in the late '80s. It worked fair but had a lot of QRN from the cars parked underneath in the garage. The dimensions of the f
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00118.html (10,330 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 06:43:42 -0600
Hardy and others - thank you MUCHO Beaucoup! All replies were filled with sound suggestions or anecdotal evidence that have helped me put together a trade study that is leading me to.....erect a hori
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00131.html (11,558 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: "Charles W. Shaw" <charleswshaw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:44:36 +0000
Hi, I built one right after the article appeared in QST. I live in the country with no close neighbors and had practically no noise to begin with. So I didn't notice a difference in reception, and I
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00133.html (8,879 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 07:51:10 -0600
I will let all know, Bob - plan to erect it in about two weeks, in preparation for the Pre-Stew and the ARRL 160 contest (I'll be on travel the month of December so will miss out on the Big Stew) and
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00136.html (10,794 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 10:03:59 -0400
I built one right after the article appeared in QST. I live in the country with no close neighbors and had practically no noise to begin with. So I didn't notice a difference in reception, and I didn
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00142.html (11,631 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:34:22 -0600
And, with all of that said, Tom - your technical evaluation and "cautionary" statements are spot on and I, for one, enjoy reading and assimilating as much of it all as my feeble brain allows - your f
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00145.html (12,900 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:48:35 -0700
(Quote) Hardy and others - thank you MUCHO Beaucoup! All replies were filled with sound suggestions or anecdotal evidence that have helped me put together a trade study that is leading me to.....erec
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00175.html (13,834 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu