Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+S\-meter\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: S-meter (score: 1)
Author: "Ian Keyser" <ian.keyser@btopenworld.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:36:06 -0000
it's sometimes necessary to do the S-meter reality check. My big wish is that we'd always do the S meter reality check..... I want to know just how strong my signals are... not an ego boost! Ian G3RO
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00128.html (7,678 bytes)

2. Topband: Re: S-meter (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 11:58:35 -0500
Hi Ian, VE3ZI: G3ROO: know just how strong my signals are... not an ego boost! The problem is that I tend to use S-meters only when signals reach S7 or above. Below that I use the more subjective "by
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00130.html (7,137 bytes)

3. Topband: Re: S-meter (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Waller" <NX4D@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:07:33 -0500
My big wish is that we'd always do the S meter reality check..... I want to know just how strong my signals are... not an ego boost! I wish the equipment manufacturers would give us two S-meter selec
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00131.html (8,457 bytes)

4. RE: Topband: Re: S-meter (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:19:17 -0500
S-meters have little meaning when using receiving antennas. The most copiable signals are often not moving the needle (or bars) at all, but are R5. Even when I listen on my transmit antenna, it has
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00132.html (8,583 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Re: S-meter (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:55:11 -0400
Jeff Maass wrote: S-meters have little meaning when using receiving antennas. The most copiable signals are often not moving the needle (or bars) at all, but are R5. Jeff, Here in the tropics the S m
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00134.html (9,308 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Re: S-meter (score: 1)
Author: "Ian Keyser" <ian.keyser@btopenworld.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:17:36 -0000
Yes, of course S meters cannot be relied on, but ears and some grey matter between them are better than nothing!This afternoon I got really p** off when a UA station about 2000 miles away (and it was
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00137.html (8,358 bytes)

7. RE: Topband: Re: S-meter (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:26:10 -0500
G'day Herb: I wasn't specific enough! I was replying to the comment that Ian made: "My big wish is that we'd always do the S meter reality check..... I want to know just how strong my signals are...
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00138.html (10,389 bytes)

8. Topband: Re: S-meter (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 02:27:15 +0000 (GMT)
I should make it clear that I always give reports by ear - and well appreciate that S-meter readings are totally meaningless, partly because of the lack of calibration of receivers, but mostly becaus
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00144.html (7,702 bytes)

9. Topband: Re: S-meter (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:57:50 -0500
Top ten list of reasons why a DX station might send you a 599 and still ask for a repeat on your exchange: -- Number Ten: The guy can't copy anything over 3 wpm in his head, his little code copying b
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00145.html (10,861 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Re: S-meter (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Harris" <mike.harris@horizon.co.fk>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:39:24 -0300
G'day, Interesting. I notice that a lot in contests. Now then, where would qualify as DX from my perspective? A universal problem methinks. Regards, Mike VP8NO. ______________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00152.html (8,848 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu