To: | jmaass@columbus.rr.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Re: S-meter |
From: | Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net> |
Date: | Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:55:11 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Jeff Maass wrote: S-meters have little meaning when using receiving Jeff, Here in the tropics the S meter always lets me know where I live by seldon dropping below S9 plus on 160. I use my S meter as a test indicator to measure f/b rejection of Beverages on BC station tests.Noise floor determination on Beverages is also a good use. For example yesterday I did something that I should have done long ago. My SW Beverage has been terminated in a chain link fence railing and support post which runs around my 1/2 acre plot for several hundred feet. By removing the ground connection and running the SW Beverage over the top of the fence by a few feet and down to a series of 4 foot ground rods inside the fence about 15 feet away caused my noise floor on the SW Beverage to drop about 1 and a half S units on 160. The signal levels from reference BC stations in Columbia and Venezuela did not drop at all. I repeated the test several times to make sure I was getting a correct result. In the morning I worked a bunch of solid JA contacts on this antenna.I would imagine that part of this success was due to a skew path to the southwest. Yet my S meter let me know I was making some improvement in the ability for this Beverage to receive. 73 Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Conditions Last Night, Herb Schoenbohm |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: The Beacon Tribune - Weekend Edition, John C Ceccherelli |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Topband: Re: S-meter, Jeff Maass |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Re: S-meter, Ian Keyser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |