Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Skew\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Skew\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Skew (score: 1): Author: w7my@yahoo.com (Greg Chartrand); Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:39:49 -0800 (PST); I have been reading the thread regarding skew posted by W7IUV. I wonder how much if any of the reported skew is the result of the angle from which the signal is arriving? Many, including myself have; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00100.html (7,787 bytes)
2. Topband: Skew (score: 1): Author: keithj@dsl.pipex.com (Keith Jillings); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:56:03 +0000; As long as there is atmospheric refraction, anyway. I'm the chap who discovered by accident (in 1966) that my big antenna worked vastly better when one end had fallen down and was on the ground - I h; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00103.html (8,123 bytes)
3. Topband: Skew (score: 1): Author: ve3zi@rac.ca (Roger Parsons); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:42:02 +0000 (GMT); I can't resist adding to this thread. I was in contact with Larry earlier about my experiences with skew from a location too close to the auroral zone. I have observed that when absorption is high wh; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00104.html (7,808 bytes)
4. Topband: Skew (score: 1): Author: kd9sv@comcast.net (gary nichols); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:49:40 -0500; At last...a theory that makes sense, but seriously, I have also seen numerous times in the past 13 years (since I have had beverages) that a signal would be nearly the same on any of my receive anten; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00112.html (7,304 bytes)
5. Topband: Skew (score: 1): Author: Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:28:19 -0500; What was that? other That really is normal. There are even times off-sunrise when signals scatter in from multiple directions and angles. Short-lasting peaks when the path is a tough one or marginal; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00115.html (8,239 bytes)
6. Topband: Skew (score: 1): Author: Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:40:04 -0500; Maybe it is Greg, that's of course a good question or reasonable thought. But the skew is clearly there with arrays having very little high angle response and very sharp patterns! If you listen to s; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00116.html (8,184 bytes)
7. Topband: Skew (score: 1): Author: jbattin@msn.com (jbattin); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:31:54 -0600; other With an omni directional antenna on the transmitter, there may be several paths that are as good or better than what we call the "short" path, when we are talking about signals that originate f; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00118.html (8,598 bytes)
8. Topband: Skew (score: 1): Author: kd9sv@comcast.net (gary nichols); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:03:04 -0500; I was refering to the earlier note to the reflector from Roger Parsons about the noise and absorbtion being from the Devil...de gary; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00119.html (7,072 bytes)
9. Topband: Skew (score: 1): Author: jon.zaimes@dol.net (Jon Zaimes AA1K); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:04:27 -0500; Often I have observed the band open and close on a single CQ. A couple of times I missed a new country because the CQ was too long and the sending station wasn't using break-in! 73/Jon AA1K; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00122.html (7,446 bytes)
10. Topband: Skew (score: 1): Author: kt1v@demop.com (Ted Demopoulos); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:54:39 -0500; I also have seen several times (both on topband and 80m) when a signal would be about equal on all my beverages. Since usually NE is the quietest, and my TX ants on topband are not directive, this so; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00125.html (7,475 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]