Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Ticked\s+over\s+intentional\s+interference\s+on\s+top\s+band\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:36:44 -0500
My first QSL was from the FCC. After two weeks of calling CQ on 40 with a bread boarded 6aq5 rig to no avail, FCC sent a postcard asking why as a Novice I was 20. I wound tank coil wrong and second h
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00254.html (10,725 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band (score: 1)
Author: "Mike & Coreen Smith" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:23:02 -0400
I've given out a few 598C or 557AC rst's over the years. 30 yrs ago, 95% of ops knew exactly what I was telling them. Sadly, I think it must be closer to 5% that know what I am telling them nowadays.
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00255.html (10,241 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band (score: 1)
Author: k6xt <k6xt@k6xt.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:13:10 -0700
And now we have the longer, lower, wider, heavier, more expensive, FAR less copiable RST system proposed by N7RR. A typical 120Hz buzz report might be "PAR". Par for the course? Par for the sending s
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00259.html (9,900 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:07:12 -0500
RST system problem is so many don't understand what any report is other than 599 because that's all they can copy. Ever try sending a C for chirp, or anything less than 9 for T? And ample reason for
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00260.html (11,273 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band (score: 1)
Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:47:17 -0500
There was smoke and heat over that a while back when that idea was first brought to the lists and I wrote in opposition. We don't need to go there again. I got quite a bit of private email as a resul
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00261.html (8,670 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu