Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band

To: "mstangelo@comcast.net" <mstangelo@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band
From: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:36:44 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
My first QSL was from the FCC.  After two weeks of calling CQ on 40 with a 
bread boarded 6aq5 rig to no avail, FCC sent a postcard asking why as a Novice 
I was 20.  I wound tank coil wrong and second harmonic got their attention.  
That was somewhat discreet but I hung it up in shack proudly as the monitor 
station was "DX" up in Canandaigua,, NY only miles from the border of exotic 
VE3 land.  

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 22, 2012, at 11:40, mstangelo@comcast.net wrote:

> I was taught to contact the station personally and notify him of the problem 
> tactfully.  Don't broadcast your gripe.
> 
> Try to contact him (or her)  and send an accurate signal report, such as 
> 579K. Remember, K indicates clicks and C chirp.
> 
> Contact him via an email or phone call and notify him of the issue.
> 
> I remember starting as a novice in the late sixties. We were crystal 
> controlled and we had to manually tune our rigs and chirps were common. I 
> started out with an Ameco AC1 which was a MOPA (master oscilattor power 
> amplifier) rig. I received an post card form an OO (official observer) 
> notifying be of my chirp and offering assistance if necessary. I remember the 
> note started off with something to the effect that "This is not a violation 
> notice or a 'bawling out", but one ham helping another fellow ham". I was 
> impressed with the professionalism.
> 
> Mike N2MS
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>
> To: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
> Cc: topband@contesting.com, wa3mej@comcast.net
> Sent: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:17:34 -0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band
> 
> On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 08:07 -0500, W2PM wrote:
> > But as someone else mentioned, if a station has a signal problem, and 
> > despite how beloved some of our colleagues are I have heard nasty stuff a 
> > number of times, there is nothing wrong mentioning it and people shouldn't 
> > be upset provided it's not said unconstructively.
> > 
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>