Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+buried\s+radials\s+vs\s+radials\s+on\s+the\s+ground\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+buried\s+radials\s+vs\s+radials\s+on\s+the\s+ground\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: buried radials vs radials on the ground (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:48:09 -0500; I had always understood that because of coupling, radials laid on the ground were functionally the same on top-band as those buried a few inches. Recently, some experimentation with Beverage on groun; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00193.html (7,284 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: buried radials vs radials on the ground (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:56:05 -0500; Short version: Believe what you measured. Long version: We did measurements of this for understanding and designing BOGs some years back. In the upper east central part of North Carolina (contains Ra; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00214.html (14,167 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]