Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+dx\s+window\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+dx\s+window\s*$/: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "jbattin" <jbattin@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:27:47 -0600; Although it does not solve problems everywhere, I do not know why is so hard for Stateside and Canada not to call CQ in the 30-35 window. It is great to have one place on the band where the DX is not; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00273.html (11,873 bytes)
22. RE: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:32:44 -0500; I don't know where you got that idea ... it was always expected that DX stations would call CQ in the window and listen for NA stations elsewhere (US stations would call CQ elsewhere and listened fo; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00274.html (9,097 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Ron Feutz <feutz@wctc.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:41:02 -0600; Craig, I posted before reading K1GUN's post, so I take back point #2 from my response to you. I'm not sure if we are disagreeing about anything, although I have never found the DX window 1830-35 to b; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00275.html (11,639 bytes)
24. RE: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Garry Shapiro" <garry@ni6t.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:54:10 -0800; As the old melodrama went: "Why must there be fighting and violence, violence and fighting?" Answer: because that is the way people are. The Gentleman's Agreement works on a Gentleman's Band. 160 may; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00276.html (10,339 bytes)
25. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 23:53:47 -0600; from K9DX > ... I do not know why is so I agree 100% with John. 5 kHz of protected spectrum has proven to work reasonably well. It probably needs to be moved (maybe 1820-25?) to let the JAs participa; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00279.html (9,180 bytes)
26. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Bert Barry <kimba@sprint.ca>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:39:16 -0500; I agree completely with the last statement. Contrary to what many Americans seem to think, the FCC has no authority outside the US. If the DX window is by 'Gentleman's Agreement', I will observe it!; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00282.html (8,965 bytes)
27. Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "larry pace" <pacer99@aol.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:32:43 -0700; even though the rules of a contest do not specifically mention a "DX window" i believe that some sort of window should be kept clear of US and Canadian stations. whenever i saw a spot for a DX statio; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00296.html (8,260 bytes)
28. Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:52:41 -0500; is to hear europe from the "left" and west coast. how about giving us a break? I find it both interesting and refreshing that not a single East Coast station has asked for a similar "break" from the; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00297.html (7,951 bytes)
29. Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: "larry pace" <pacer99@aol.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:12:36 -0700; I find it both interesting and refreshing that not a single East Coast station has asked for a similar "break" from the Westerners who are CQ-ing in the JA window from 1810-1825...and I always though; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00298.html (8,210 bytes)
30. Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:18:06 -0500; JA DX window. anything to help others work DX on topband. That's a deal Larry! However, I'll make a little wager that there will be far more Western folks CQ-ing between 1810-1825 after JA sunset tha; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00299.html (8,177 bytes)
31. Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:22:09 -0500; wager that there will be far more Western folks CQ-ing between 1810-1825 after JA sunset than there are Eastern folks CQ-ing between 1830-1835 at any time. I meant to add "in the upcoming CQ 160 CW"; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00300.html (7,938 bytes)
32. Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: "Randy Oates" <w6oar@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:05:05 -0800; I don't like to get into this kind of discussion, but this one is getting to me. I personally don't see a need for a dx window with the dx cluster spotting . I think it has outlived it's usefulness .; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00301.html (8,738 bytes)
33. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Ron Feutz <feutz@wctc.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:39:32 -0600; FWIW, I didn't write a single syllable of the last few messages copied to the reflector under my name. If anyone else feels the need to chime in, please delete "Ron Feutz wrote". 73, Ron - WA9IRV At; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00303.html (11,162 bytes)
34. Re: Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: kb9cry@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:44:21 +0000; Yes but no. Having a dedicated DX window in effect during a contest, especially on 160, is a good thing. Imagine trying to pull out those weak EU sigs while domestic big guns are all around you; and; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00304.html (10,033 bytes)
35. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "jbattin" <jbattin@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:15:25 -0600; I believe there are few problems with the way it is now .... VE and W/K can call in the window ... just not CQ. It is so handy to be able to zip up into the window and see how loud the DX is, and by; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00305.html (15,465 bytes)
36. Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:07:38 -0500; Randy, I believe you have the right idea. Having operated about 50% of my Topband life from Colorado, and having held the #6 USA DXCC total at 238 confirmed when I left in 1993, I completely agree w; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00308.html (12,133 bytes)
37. Re: Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: "jbattin" <jbattin@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:26:38 -0600; Most of this discussion revolves around contests ... in which case for most of us packet spots are not available. As for daily operating ... I agree there is little use for the window... the band is; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00309.html (9,973 bytes)
38. Re: Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:17:07 -0500; This has been like listening to my friend Waldo on an endless loop tape. Every single argument everyone has used is a repeat of arguments I've heard since 1963. I mean EVERY argument and complaint. W; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00313.html (8,604 bytes)
39. RE: Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:10:00 -0800; Nicely stated Tom. Your sentiments bring back memories of *The Amateur's Code* that used to appear in the front of every ARRL publication. I seem to remember words like considerate, loyal, progressiv; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00314.html (9,517 bytes)
40. Re: Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:40:52 -0800; "I find it both interesting and refreshing that not a single East Coast station has asked for a similar "break" from the Westerners who are CQ-ing in the JA window from 1810-1825." == "JA window from; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00317.html (8,120 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]