Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+high\s+take\-off\s+angle\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Eldridge" <eldridge@direct.ca>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:25:55 -0700
Hear! Hear! Especially at or near SR and SS. Bob VE7BS _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00100.html (7,155 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:15:02 +0200
_______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00102.html (7,392 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Lunday" <mlunday@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:02:03 -0400
ON4UN's book has lots of info on high angle signals arriving at SR and SS. John's motto - you can never have too many receiving antennas for the different conditions. Mark Lunday WD4ELG _____________
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00111.html (7,626 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: Arthur Delibert <radio75a3@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:19:20 -0400
In QST for September 1995, Brian Beezley, K6STI, had an article titled "A Receiving Antenna That Rejects Local Noise" and Ed Andress had a companion article, "A K6STI Low-Noise Receiving Antenna for
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00112.html (10,162 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: Dave Mueller <daven2nl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:14:04 +1000
When designing a low band antenna for my Guam QTH, I purposely went through great trouble to make a true "TEE" vertical to avoid having an inverted L on 160. I figured that being limited to 55ft of v
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00115.html (8,728 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:49:50 +0200
Yes well I might explain my statement a little. First of all I have read all the books by ON4UN and also this by NM7M together with lots of other writeups etc etc. I am NOT saying that thats not true
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00117.html (10,514 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Eldridge" <eldridge@direct.ca>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:20:19 -0700
Hi Jim Twenty years or so ago NM7M wrote a program in DOS that predicted the position of the "tilt" in the E layer on the dark side of the terminator, more than usual refraction at that point causing
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00118.html (8,849 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:10:47 -0400 (EDT)
I agree with N2NL's post. As he is, I was located in the Pacific and everything was pretty much long haul, with the US being closest at 2500 miles. I went with a Tee-top suspended on a caternary from
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00120.html (8,346 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:10:51 -0400
My point was that with one antenna you could have both angles available. The important thing is having the other station hear you and if you cover a wider range of angles you automatically have bette
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00124.html (10,334 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:42:24 -0400
Jim, it doesnt surprise me since youre generally North of the auroral zone so the signals have to go under it otherwise they are reflected or absorbed. The effect seems to be more pronounced on 80 an
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00125.html (12,260 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:26:20 -1000
I agree that some high angle may be the optimum at some situation, but getting all angles from one antenna I cant see as the answer, you are putting power into all the different angle and no real pow
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00127.html (12,077 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:28:54 +0000 (GMT)
Yea, there are high angle signals, anyone can verify that by having perhaps the simplest antenna - Inverted Vee at least some 30 ft up. Careful with interaction with other antennas within about 1 wav
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00131.html (9,975 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:10:08 -0400
What does Eznec say about the lobe powers? it seems that high angle does a lot of good as many are amazed how well it works especially when an optimum ground is impossible to install. A good friend w
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00132.html (14,823 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu