Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+radials\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:40:20 -1000; "If you have really good soil, you might get by with less. If it were me, I would go with 40 to 60 depending on how hard it is to put them down." In most cases, I would guess, the harder it is to put; /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00118.html (6,383 bytes)
22. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: <doktorij@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:26:16 -0400; Hi Adrian, Unless you're blessed with soft loamy soil that cuts easy, I would hazard to guess that any way you go will be hard work. If you have nice soft loam you can use a "sled" like in ON4UN's bo; /archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00053.html (7,331 bytes)
23. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: ABowenN4OO <abowen@nettally.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:45:29 -0400; I have installed a number of radial systems for myself and some local friends. The north Florida grasses are a little different, being the type that grows like a vine, setting down roots every few in; /archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00064.html (10,116 bytes)
24. Re: Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: David Sinclair <k3ky@radioprism.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:03:00 -0400; My lot is very different. It's not densely vegetated. More like forest, with sparse vegetation. I use smaller, insulated wire, and have found a very easy way to lay the wires close to the ground. Al; /archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00069.html (8,932 bytes)
25. Topband: radials (score: 1): Author: "Louis Anciaux" <hp3xug@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:01:06 +0000; Hola All, Since the "Dry & Windy" season is here, besides QRNN climbing well above S9 most of the time, am also under the impression the big iron I beam that starts the gnd system at base of the vert; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00379.html (7,209 bytes)
26. Re: Topband: radials (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:32:29 -0800; When I lived in Florida on 1/2 acre, Louis, I started out with a 50' tall Marconi (flat-top was an 80 meter dipole) using 4 elevated radials and 100 watts. It didn't work all that well. Later, I adde; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00396.html (9,116 bytes)
27. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: David Cole <g3rcq@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:47:31 +0000 (GMT); Hi all and thanks for all the help on how deep to bury radials. My question this time - I am going to put in a 4 square and following ON4UN's book 4th ed page 11-85 states that it is standard procede; /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00040.html (7,079 bytes)
28. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:46:19 -0800; Dave: I put up a 40 meter 4-square 2 years ago with 64 radials on each element. I put the radial system in with soldering to a central bus along each side as shown by ON4UN. The system impedances are; /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00044.html (7,351 bytes)
29. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L" <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:31:29 -0800; elements. I will probably get slammed for saying this, but it probably does no harm to interconnect the radials, and might actually help, because how long each radial is not important in the abstrac; /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00046.html (7,549 bytes)
30. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:32:50 -0800; Totally agreed on interconnection of radials. The half as long comment was only made to show wire would be wasted in my opinion if they were not bus style interconnected. They would be totally overla; /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00048.html (7,520 bytes)
31. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 21:06:18 -0700 (PDT); Gents, I have a 30' vertical with a 40 meter trap at the top, some horizontal wire to an 80 meter trap and additional horizontal wire for 160 meters. It is mounted on a 20' pole at the end of the roo; /archives//html/Topband/2008-05/msg00043.html (7,048 bytes)
32. Re: Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 07:53:55 -0700; Thanks to copper speculators, wire is no longer cheap, but it still costs a LOT less than a power amp (or the electricity to run the amp). Use what you have, but don't stop at 75 ft of "found" wire -; /archives//html/Topband/2008-05/msg00044.html (7,027 bytes)
33. Topband: radials (score: 1): Author: Brendan Minish <ei6iz.brendan@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:22:36 +0000; Under my 1/4 wave Inverted L (~18M vertical section) I have a mix of buried radials and radials lying on the grass (for the winter months only) In total there are around 20 radials with lengths of be; /archives//html/Topband/2010-11/msg00011.html (7,373 bytes)
34. Re: Topband: radials (score: 1): Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:45:00 -0400 (EDT); Hi Brendan, You'll have an arcing problem if you lay chicken wire directly on radials with no insulation. You could avoid this if you bond the radials to the outer edge of the chicken wire, but this; /archives//html/Topband/2010-11/msg00013.html (9,210 bytes)
35. Re: Topband: radials (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:39:07 +0100; I would shoot for 60 1/4 wl on the ground (like W3LPL says). This will be "very close to" optimum and the losses in the near field will be well below 1 dB. Anything less is going to be "dB down". Mea; /archives//html/Topband/2010-11/msg00015.html (9,755 bytes)
36. Re: Topband: radials (score: 1): Author: dt <wd5r@hughes.net>; Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 06:58:06 -0600; Hi Jan, In late 80's we were bitten by the 160mtr bug. Put up a Rohn25 to 125ft with about 10 radials.. Didn't take long to recognize that we needed some improvement in radial system. Being on small; /archives//html/Topband/2010-11/msg00017.html (7,504 bytes)
37. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: "John Harden, D.M.D." <jhdmd@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:31:49 -0400; I have a 100 foot 45G tower that I have shunt fed for 160. It currently has 32 radials of #14 black, stranded wire from Home Depot. I have a circular radial bus of #06 solid copper that is clamped to; /archives//html/Topband/2011-08/msg00035.html (7,317 bytes)
38. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:03:52 +0000; Moxon, G6XN once proposed using elevated radials that wereless than źwavelength long, tied together and fed through a commoninductor.His idea was it would beeasier to achieve current and phase balanc; /archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00136.html (8,344 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 38
Page: [1] [2]