Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wind\s+Load\s+of\s+Coax\s+Against\s+Tower\s+Leg\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wind\s+Load\s+of\s+Coax\s+Against\s+Tower\s+Leg\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Wind Load of Coax Against Tower Leg (score: 1): Author: k2wk@crystal.palace.net (Walt Kornienko); Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 11:35:15 -0500 (EST); Does anyone know how much the wind load is decreased by running coax against a tower leg. Hypothetically, A 1" wide by 144" long piece of SQUARE coax would have have a wind load of 1 sq ft. How much; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00110.html (8,113 bytes)
2. Wind Load of Coax Against Tower Leg (score: 1): Author: kurscj@oampc12.csg.mot.com (Chad Kurszewski WE9V); Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 13:13:44 -0600; 0.67 ref: ex-W6QHS, "Physical Design of Yagis" -- Chad Kurszewski, WE9V e-mail: Chad_Kurszewski@csg.mot.com The Official "Sultans of Shwing" Web Site: http://www.QTH.com/sos -- FAQ on WWW: http://www; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00115.html (7,824 bytes)
3. Wind Load of Coax Against Tower Leg (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat, 8 Feb 1997 05:20:13 -0500 (EST); Hi, Walt -- Good question. Most informed sources I've seen use a figure of approximately 0.67 for round members. So your one square foot of calculated area would be 0.67 square feet of round windload; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00134.html (8,487 bytes)
4. Wind Load of Coax Against Tower Leg (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat, 8 Feb 1997 17:48:17 -0500 (EST); Hi, Walt -- Your assumption is basically correct. The Rohn tower loading figure in the book is the NET result after deducting 1) the square footage of the cables and 2) 8 sq.ft. of antenna mount at t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00158.html (8,922 bytes)
5. Wind Load of Coax Against Tower Leg (score: 1): Author: Joe Subich" <W8IK@ibm.net (Joe Subich); Date: Sat, 08 Feb 97 20:12:40 -0500; I would consider one modification to that analysis ... reduce the amount of "extra" antenna load you can add by deleting some of the extra feedlines. The feedline load is distributed along the entire; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00164.html (8,447 bytes)
6. Wind Load of Coax Against Tower Leg (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 09:51:07 -0500 (EST); Hi, Barry -- What about my other statements? I was hoping that someone would be able to address the more esoteric forces and calculations of the cable vis-a-vis tower load. Not being an engineer I ne; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00173.html (8,435 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]