This reminds me of the daf amplifier debate.
Mike
AB5XP
Alan Watts:
There are basically two kinds of philosophy. One's called prickles, the
other's
called goo. And prickly people are precise, rigorous, logical. They like
everything chopped up and clear. Goo people like it vague. For example, in
physics, prickly people believe that the ultimate constituents of matter
are
particles. Goo people believe it's waves. And in philosophy, prickly people
are
logical positivists, and goo people are idealists. And they're always
arguing
with each other, but what they don't realize is neither one can take his
position without the other person. Because you wouldn't know you advocated
prickles unless there was someone advocating goo. You wouldn't know what a
prickle was unless you knew what a goo was. Because life isn't either
prickles
or goo, it's either gooey prickles or prickly goo. They go together like
back
and front, male and female. And that's the answer to philosophy. You see,
I'm
a
philosopher, and I'm not going to argue very much, because if you don't
argue
with me, I don't know what I think. So if we argue, I say 'Thank you,'
because
owing to the courtesy of your taking a different point of view, I
understand
what I mean. So I can't get rid of you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Harlin <harlins@swipnet.se>
To: Mike Sawyer <kc4slk@csrlink.net>; amps@contesting.com
<amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Friday, December 31, 1999 7:23 AM
Subject: SV: [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing...
>
>
>----- Ursprungligt meddelande -----
>Från: Mike Sawyer <kc4slk@csrlink.net>
>Till: <amps@contesting.com>; <nospam4me@juno.com>
>Skickat: den 31 december 1999 14:42
>Ämne: Re: [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing...
>
>
>
>> It appears that this circuit would use far less materials to construct
(i.e.
>> lack of a screen supply).
>> If it was even close to a great design, companies like QRO, Command,
Alpha
>> Power etc, (Ameritron
>> wouldn't hesitate) would be falling "ass-over-tin-cups" producing it!
>
>> Of course this is the only side of the argument I can take up since I
have
>> never heard one on the air.
>
>Or ever seen one? Used one? Built one?
>Good platform for reveiw...!
>
>Mike, in a few hours we have seen the new Millennium - You have´nt ! ;-o))
>
>73 de Lars/SM3BDZ
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|