Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] RE: ALC

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] RE: ALC
From: ki7rw@arrl.net (Lee Roberts)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:37:54 -0700
If it's considered useless, then why is ALC provided? And why don't
manufacturers build their amps so that they can't be overdriven if
ALC  can't do the job?

>From: "measures" <measures@vcnet.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Date: 2/14/00  10:37:26AM
>To: "Peter Chadwick" <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com>,
"'rb'"@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] RE:
>
><rbigg@pcola.gulf.net>,
>        "'amps'" <amps@contesting.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Sender: owner-amps@contesting.com 
>Precedence: bulk
>X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C
>
>
>>
>>Ron, K5BDJ, asks
>>
>>>So, is there a strong case for ALC, when the capability is there?
>>
>>I'll stick my neck out a bit here. ALC as it is usually
>implemented  is a
>>bit like shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted.
>
>Excellent, Peter.
>
>
>
>-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>end
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>