-----Original Message-----
From: measures <2@vc.net>
To: Steve Thompson <rfamps@ic24.net>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date: 27 March 2000 14:21
Subject: Re: [AMPS] The G2DAF Amplifier; Intents and Purposes
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: measures <2@vc.net>
>To: Phil Clements <philk5pc@tyler.net>; Steve Thompson <rfamps@ic24.net>;
>AMPS <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Date: 26 March 2000 19:39
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] The G2DAF Amplifier; Intents and Purposes
>
>snip
>
>>I realize that it sounds off the wall, but I am beginning to suspect that
>>some of the true-believers may have had trouble with an authority figure
>>during their early childhoods. For some, the 3/2-Power Law seemingly
>>sticks in their craw.
>
>According to the equation in 'Care and Feeding', if you keep the screen
>voltage constant and ignore the anode term (like Eimac says you can), then
>Ia is proportional to Vg^3/2. Does this application of the 3/2 law produce
>non-linear amplification?
¿Say what.?
Section 2.2 of 'Care and feeding..' I don't have my copy to hand at this
computer for the page reference, but you can find it on their web site
version. Is Eimac's equation incorrect?
Steve
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|