Look,
If Rich said it, that's all you need to know.
-S
>
> From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
> Date: 2005/02/24 Thu AM 07:03:36 EST
> To: TexasRF@aol.com
> CC: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Fwd: Pi-L In-circuit Adjustment Question
>
>
> On Feb 23, 2005, at 2:41 PM, TexasRF@aol.com wrote:
>
> >
> > In a message dated 2/21/2005 4:47:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> > r@somis.org writes
> >
> > ?
> >> An L-network transforms E and I by operating near resonance.? The
> >> greater the Z-transformation, the closer it operates to resonance,
> >> the
> >> greater the circulating I in the inductor, the greater the E across
> >> the
> >> capacitor., and the greater the operating Q.? However, an L-network
> >> is
> >> never operated dead-on resonance because there would be ° E and ° I.
> >
> -- I typed the infinity character before the E and the I. What OS are
> you using, Gerald?
> >
> > ? On AMPS, those who joke about AC circuit analysis are destined to
> > become one.
>
> ??
> > ?
> > Rich,
> > This sounds like a truly serious individual. I am too; I like that.
> > ?
> > But, comparing well known and documented AC circuit analysis with flat
> > earth is a little disappointing to those of us who are truly
> > interested in gaining accurate knowledge of the subject under
> > discussion. This does not sound?like a serious individual. Why in the
> > world would you take such a shallow position on a serious topic?
> > ?
> > I hope you don't feel threatened in some small way by the direction
> > the discussion has been going.
>
> chortle
>
> > Few of our group (if any) know everything about rf designing so I
> > expect most of us still have a bit to learn, I know I do.
>
> And me too.
>
> > I also know by some of the comments you have made that you can learn
> > as well if you desire to do that. You have a tremendous amount?of very
> > useful knowledge to share and can make it even more valuable with
> > little effort.
>
> I have less knowledge than you presume, but, unlike some, I usually
> know to close my mouth when I'm in over my head.
> > ?
> > Any of the aspects of rf design we discuss should be able to stand the
> > burden of mathematical proof. If it can't, then it is highly suspect.
> > A flat out statement like "no capacitor will resonate a Pi network" is
> > an example of a suspect statement.
>
> I have been thinking about coming up with a 60Hz L-network problem that
> illustrates what goes on when an L-network begins to approach
> resonance.
> > ?
> > ... Won't you reconsider your position on this and help us reason
> > through and understand the true facts of the matter?
>
> Are you ready for the aforementioned problem?
> > ?
> > If not, then ok, but in the future when you offer technical
> > information there will be that "hmmm?", in my?mind as well as many
> > others.
>
> This has always been the case. There are still some denizens here who
> believe that it's absolutely, positively, 100% impossible for a
> VHF-rated tube to oscillate at VHF in a g-g HF amplifier.
> - I received an e-mail from an observer who thinks you are on a
> hunting expedition.
> > ?
> > 73,
> > Gerald/K5GW
> >
>
> Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|