| To: | amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Bird Element Calibration? |
| From: | Ivan Makarov <left@rogers.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:43:54 -0500 (EST) |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
My "thank you" to the person who initiated the thread. I believe Bird 43 is a well supported myth. Same as Coaxial Dynamics one. --- Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net> wrote: > > > > To some it is like a religion. To even think of > questioning it you will > be accused of blasphemy. > > 73 > Gary K4FMX > > > _______________________________________________ > Amps mailing list > Amps@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps > _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Measuring RF Power, Gary Schafer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] 50ohm:200ohm toroidal transformer, gdaught6 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Bird Element Calibration?, Karl-Arne Markström |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Bird Element Calibration?, paul.whatton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |