To: | david.kirkby@onetel.net, Amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] RMS VS Peak VS Average power and the Bird 43 wattmeter |
From: | Dennis12Amplify@aol.com |
Date: | Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:23:03 EST |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 3/28/05 11:44:12 PM Central Standard Time, david.kirkby@onetel.net writes: If you keep the modulation depth constant (as verified with a scope), does the kit perform more poorly as you increase the frequency of modulation? Slightly; like 1 or 2 percent, but not nearly the 20% or more difference in the readings. For this analysis, let's assume no change in meter readings with modulation frequency. Regards, Dennis O. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] RMS VS Peak VS Average power and the Bird 43 wattmeter, Dennis12Amplify |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] RMS VS Peak VS Average power and the Bird 43 wattmeter, Dennis12Amplify |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] RMS VS Peak VS Average power and the Bird 43 wattmeter, Dennis12Amplify |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] RMS VS Peak VS Average power and the Bird 43 wattmeter, Dennis12Amplify |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |