Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa

To: r@somis.org, david.kirkby@onetel.net
Subject: Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa
From: G3rzp@aol.com
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 05:38:22 EDT
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 16/04/2005 23:11:05 GMT Standard Time, r@somis.org  writes:

Which is  why accurate readings are done with a calibrated step 
attenuator - using  the S-meter only as a relative indicator.


But what is the resolution of the S meter? Most S meters have S9 at half  
scale. At the nominal 6 dB/S point, that's a 54 dB range, or to read any  
difference to 1dB requires reading the meter to better than 1%. Note this  
nothing to 
do with accuracy - merely resolution. On a big 6 inch scale meter,  maybe - 
and that's always assuming that there's no hysteris.
 
However, it's well known that the ionosphere can be non linear. The  
'Luxembourg Effect'.
 
73
 
Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>