| To: | "Carcia, Francis A HS" <francis.carcia@hs.utc.com>,"R.Measures" <r@somis.org>, "John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] why not graphite anodes? |
| From: | "Peter Chadwick" <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:26:54 +0100 |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Rich said >In pulse service. 3-500Zs offer virtually no advantage over 3-400Zs. Electrically, this almost certainly true. But how about price and availability? 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Amps] 3-400z status, John T. M. Lyles |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] Two Tone Generator, wc6w@juno.com |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] why not graphite anodes?, Carcia, Francis A HS |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] why not graphite anodes?, R . Measures |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |