To: | r@somis.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] LK500 various |
From: | Gudguyham@aol.com |
Date: | Tue, 30 May 2006 16:02:48 EDT |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 5/30/2006 1:19:21 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, r@somis.org writes: As I see it, not requiring a MOV across NEC / UL approved switches suggests that whoever wrote the present Code needs to take a course in Reactance/Susceptance/Impedance/Admittance TRUE, BUT SWITCHES ARE MADE TO CONTAIN THE MOMENTARY ARC THAT OCCURS. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] LK500 various, Gudguyham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] LK500 various, Gudguyham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] LK500 various, Gudguyham |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] LK500 various, R L Measures |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |