Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] EIMAC vs. SED 3CPX800A7

To: "Craig Anderson Ext 1365" <Craig.Anderson@saintpaul.edu>
Subject: Re: [Amps] EIMAC vs. SED 3CPX800A7
From: "Merit Arnold" <w6nq@rfparts.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:21:19 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Many years back, Svetlana (Huntsville) marked the same tube with both 3cx &
3cpx numbers.  I don't know which design it was.
Now, only the 3cx verity available in limited numbers.
Svetlana is not planning to build this tube in 2006.

FYI:  the RFP website has New Eimac 3cpx800a7 and 3cpx1500a7 with 2006 date
code.

Merit  W6NQ





> EIMAC is on backorder for their 3CPX800A7 tubes until October and my
> other choice is the Russian built SED which spun off of Svetlana a few
> years ago.  Has anyone had experience with SED tubes particular the
> 3CXP800A7.  I am concerned about mixing an SED with an EIMAC tube in the
same amp.
> Craig W9CLA



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Amps] EIMAC vs. SED 3CPX800A7, Merit Arnold <=