Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] pi filter QBL 5/3500

To: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] pi filter QBL 5/3500
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:03:55 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
> His output impedance will be slightly above 3 kohms.
> So 300pf are plenty on 80m, also on 160m when his Q is not 
> higher then 10 it
> will be fine as strays add to it.

Strays nomally subtract from the effective capacitance on 
160. They add on higher bands, but the shunt reactance of 
the choke dominatates on 160 and 80 reducing effective 
capacitance....not that a Q of 8 makes much difference in 
anything from what a Q of 12 would do.

> But with high impedance a higher Q will be needed for 
> sufficient harmonic
> supression, so 500pf is the better choice.
> A padder of 500pf for 160m loading should be sufficient 
> for proper loading
> from 25-150 ohms.

The biggest problem for higher harmonics is usually layout 
or lead dress. You'd have to double Q or more to make any 
worthwhile change in the lower harmonics. If the second 
harmonic is an issue, better to make a series tuned trap out 
of the padding capacitor. Then you can gain 20 dB or more of 
additional suppression with no change in Q.

73 Tom 


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>