Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] "babying" radios and tubes, can do or not?

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] "babying" radios and tubes, can do or not?
From: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:32:51 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Kind of like babying fuses.

Do you run them at 100% or at 10% ?


Don W4DNR



Quoting Carl <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charles Harpole" <k4vud@hotmail.com>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 3:17 AM
> Subject: [Amps] "babying" radios and tubes, can do or not?
>
>
>>
>> I want to know if there are any REAL benefits from babying a radio  
>> or an amp?
>
> ** Yes but you have to seperate facts from myths
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> I hear lots of talk about running lower RF power to "save the  
>> finals" or "save the tubes" and even hear people talk about turning  
>> radios off for taking a one hour (or less) break.
>
>
> ** Ive managed to keep the original Eimac 3-500's in my 1964  
> LK-500ZC by running at 1200W and regularly gettering them. At the  
> same time the TS-940/TS-950SD are run at 80W which cools down the PS  
> a bit plus has better IMD. Only one PS board failure since 1987 in  
> the 940 and they are notorious for that.
> I also have a 3 holer Alpha 76PA that also runs 1200W as its not  
> worth the ~1db difference based upon replacement cost of 8874's.
>
> On the shelf is a Dentron MLA-2500 and DTR-2000L both with original  
> tubes, 2X 8875 and 8877 respectively. They get used once in awhile  
> to keep the replacement caps reformed and the tubes gettered.
>
>
>>
>>
>> We do know, probably, that high inrush current may stress parts  
>> inside tubes.  But, there must be some smart folks who test things  
>> to destruction who can speak with scientific instead of parental  
>> certainty about this.
>
> ** For most ham style amps that is a myth as the cold resistance of  
> the filament causes a properly designed transformer to be self  
> limiting. This is especially important with directly heated tubes  
> such as the 3-500 where way too many go into a panic and get poorly  
> designed step starts. Consider that the 3-400/3-500 filament is the  
> same as used in the 4-250A/400A since the 40's with no such  
> silliness required.
> The only benefit of a step start is to save undersized power on  
> switches and then the step start fails and takes out the resistor  
> when least wanted.In the SB-220 the switch is almost unobtanium but  
> there are work arounds.  In an Ameritron the usual step start  
> failure blows the resistor and line fuse and if the owner keeps  
> trying fuses the transformer complains or the damage is already  
> done. Its a very poor design.
>
> Unless overly high C caps (totally unnecessary) have been stuffed in  
> a commercial amp the PS doesnt need a step start, the transfomer  
> clunk at turn on is non destructive and the 1N5408 and larger diodes  
> can easily take the surge. The 270uF caps available from Ameritron  
> are more sufficient for the normal user; forget about the obsessive  
> ones. If buying elsewhere the 330uF are OK but 470uF is pushing it.  
> I use 330uF Snap-Ins in SB-220's since they fit the blocks  
> perfectly, always turn on in the CW position and the switch survives  
> if it hasnt already been beat to hell and back over 30-40 years.
>
>>
>> It seems to be true that one can run any of the usual amp tubes at  
>> rated specs for hundreds of thousands of hours before they really  
>> go bad?
>
>
> ** Pure myth. The average tube is good for 10K hours in proper use  
> and running at proper full spec before emission starts to noticably  
> fall off. Many do more and others less, especially the latter for  
> Chinese tubes. If I average 1 hour a day over the 26 years on my  
> LK-500ZC it hasnt reached 10K yet. At 2hrs/day thats a hair under 19K.
>
>
>>
>> I guess tiny impurities in the metal and not a perfect vacuum does  
>> lead to failure eventually, but what are the real reasons?
>
>
> ** GAS and not to be confused with seal leage to outside air. Ive  
> gone over the gettering process on here enough times and Im not  
> going to keep repeating myself.
> All glass tubes outgass and destructive internal arcs do happen that  
> are preventable. Most ceramic-metal tubes do it a lot less and the  
> gettering process is simply normal use. Seal leakage is almost non  
> existant altho certain tubes with glass seals in the base are prone,  
> ask anyone with PL-172's.
>
>
>>
>> What is the real physics condition of a so called "soft" tube?  Why?
>
>
> ** Loss of filament/cathode emission due to
> .. hours
> .. under/over filament voltage
> .. excessive dissipation, this can also be due to dirty cooling  
> systems and nicotine covered glass tubes. Heat is a killer.
>
>
>>
>> What is really the cause of transistor failure if always operated  
>> within specs?
>>
>
> ** Gremlins
> .. parasitics
> .. voltage spikes
> .. poor VSWR/intermittent relays coupled to insufficient protection circuits
> .. Other component failures
>
> The average power transistor is made up of many small transistors in  
> parallel under the cover. If say 24 are on the wafer and ony 18 are  
> needed to meet spec they get shipped as there is no way to know how  
> many are good to start with. Each wafer is not inspected and its a  
> rare case that any are ever perfect.
> As each subsequent one fails the others carry the load until there  
> is total failure.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> And, if you run your 100 watt radio at 80 watts, are you "saving"  
>> the radio or just your electric bill?
>
> ** I dont pay attention to my electric bill, if I cant afford it I  
> should get rid of the 5 PC's and 3 TV's first.
> To me it only means less stress and better IMD. The sweet point  
> varies in a curve and 50W may be horrible but 80 is just about a  
> given with a nominal 100W rig.
>
>> Inquiring minds want to know.  Please.
>> 73
>> >
>> Charles Harpole
>> k4vud@hotmail.com
>>
>
>
> ** Hope Ive answered a few questions before proceeding to Part Deux
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2433/5069 - Release Date: 06/14/12
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>