Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Oil v water cooling

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Oil v water cooling
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 05:28:33 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>


It's been a long time, but as John said, these solutions are ion hungry and particularly DI water. We measured resistivity at ohms per cubic centimeter,. It's not just solder, they will reduce a brass hose fitting to a dull copper color that you can crumble with your fingers. It also likes copper, to the resistivity monitoring mentioned several times is a necessity. We went through thousands of gallons of DI water. Oil can most likely be used on almost any water cooled tube, but water is likely, by far, the best for carrying heat away. I can't imagine using oil

73

Roger  (K8RI)



On 4/16/2015 12:13 PM, David Lisney wrote:
Hi, I believe that not all "distilled water" is suitable for this, you may need to specify 
"deionised water". The water conductivity needs regular checking, it will rise as it gets 
contaminated by traces of solder flux etc...I seem to remember where in a published design for a 
watercooled amplifier that about 6" from the tube anode that the plastic cooling pipe went through 
a brass coupler that had a meter connected between it and chassis ground to monitor leakage current.
Regards David G0FVT

Sent from my iPad

On 16 Apr 2015, at 17:01, amps-request@contesting.com wrote:

Send Amps mailing list submissions to
    amps@contesting.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    amps-request@contesting.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
    amps-owner@contesting.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Amps digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. oil vs distilled water cooling. (John Lyles)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:57:07 -0600
From: John Lyles <jtml@losalamos.com>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] oil vs distilled water cooling.
Message-ID: <552F3313.2080307@losalamos.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

##  so exactly what is the issue with oil vs distilled water ???   Distilled 
water
can be found in 4 litre jugs, cheap, at any grocery store.  To the best of my 
knowledge,
distilled water will extract heat a lot faster / better than oil.   I only saw 
1-2 small tubes in the
entire Eimac catalog that used oil cooling.  All their big commercial broadcast 
tubes are either
air, or water, or vapor phase cooled tubes.  Or multi-phase cooled.... which is 
a combo of
water cooled and vapour phase cooling.
All of the amplifiers I design and use at work are water cooled, some
flowing water and some multiphase, or hypervapotron mode, which is the
same thing but a trademark. Its not a tough problem to crack, and I'm
dealing with considerable HV. I studied the RCA, Eimac and Thomson
recommendations some years ago, and use a common set of specifications.
Keep the DC leakage current in the hoses < 500 uA per hose. So for
whatever resistivity is maintained, the hose diameter and length is
designed for this current (resistance) at the maximum plate voltage to
be used. DI water is closed loop cooled, as its New Mexico and we cannot
waste water. This complicates things with heat exchangers and secondary
loops with cooling towers. Since the water is recycled, we have to watch
the ph and the dissolved oxygen level as well. For < 5 kV DC I think the
requirements are much less difficult to meet.

Now, adding an ionic additive like water wetter is risky for a pure DI
or distilled water system. One reply said the typical content is:
DiIsoPropyl Alcohol Ether 1-4.9%
TriIsopropyl Alcohol Diether 1-4.9%
Sodium Molybdate 1-4.9%
Tolyltriazole 1-3%
PolySiloxane Polymer
That third one is a good corrosion inhibitor. I use the same molybdate
as an ionic additive, that when put in solution with pure water, makes
an excellent dummy load. The amount is about 0.5% by weight, and I use
what are called water column loads. These are essentially
multiwavelength long coaxial cylinders with a shorted center conductor
at the far end. They contain a way for this solution to flow through,
and if I use pure water the mismatch is terrible, like 1 dB RL. When I
add the 0.5%, the match becomes 20 dB RL at a specific frequency. So a
tiny bit of molybdate makes a huge change in RF loss. I have also
noticed that it makes a large difference in the DC conductivity of the
solution. My best soup is 530 microsiemens/cm^2. With just a few hundred
cc dumped into a system with several hundred gallons flowing will change
this value by a factor or 2 or more.

I would be wary of doping the distilled water with these chemicals
without doing an experiment first.


##  last year, I tested distilled water  vs  tap water  with just a fluke 87 
dvm.  The
dc resistance of distilled water is sky high compared to tap water. Distilled 
water is
a superb insulator.   Dunno what happens to the dc resistance once  water 
wetter is
added to the distilled water.  I should re-run the test.   For a tube cooling 
application
it?s a moot point, since it?s a closed loop anyway.

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


------------------------------

End of Amps Digest, Vol 148, Issue 22
*************************************
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>