Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 12V IM3

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 12V IM3
From: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 17:48:28 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Repeatedly some of you have mentioned the supposed advantage of running a device at very much lower output power than its saturation level, to improve linearity. This is true only to a point, not all the way down to zero! To get good linearity, an amplifier should of course not be driven into hard saturation, that much should be pretty obvious. But running it at a very low level, such as 1/4 the maximum non-sat output, brings the distortion up again, due to crossover distortion, unless it's class A.

Another very important point is efficiency. The dissipation of an amplifier does NOT vary in direct proportion to the output level it's run at! An amplifier gets more efficient, the higher it is driven. A decent class AB amplifier might be 60% efficient when driven just to the brink of clipping. A theoretically perfect class B amplifier would be 78% efficient at this level. But if the same amplifiers are driven to only one quarter that power level, the perfect class B one becomes only 39% efficient, and the practical class AB one just 30%. A consequence is that a practical 1500W output amplifier, designed to operate close to saturation, will dissipate 1000W (plus filaments, fans, bleeders, etc), while an amplifier designed to saturate at 6000W and run at 1500W will disipate 3500W, plus the four times larger heater, bleeder, fan etc! That is if it uses a relatively low quiescent current. If instead that current is higher, the situation is even worse!

This makes clear that improving the IMD in the brute force way, by using an oversized amplifier, results in an extremely large, heavy and expensive amplifier, that's also expensive to operate. It's a very poor method for improving the IMD!

With more clever circuit design, such as negative feedback, bias modulation, and in extreme cases predistortion, a lot more IMD improvement can be obtained at far lower cost, and no added weight nor power consumption.

Keep in mind that most tube type ham linear amps aren't using any negative feedback at all, let alone any other linearizing techniques, and that even those solid state amplifiers that have a large gain excess rarely use it to provide more linearity by negative feedback, but instead burn off the excess drive power in an attenuator! Now that's a real waste. Something as simple as increasing the negative feedback to consume the excess gain of modern MOSFETs goes a long way in reducing IMD.

Manfred

========================
Visit my hobby homepage!
http://ludens.cl
========================
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>