Hello All,
Can anyone give references for shunt feeding lattice towers,
75'self supporting with a good radial system for 80m.
THANKS
WARREN
ZL1AIX
On 24/02/09 4:29 AM, "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com> wrote:
> Bill and all,
>
> If I change from 5" to 8" the reactance moves the right way, but the
> resistance moves the opposite direction. The net result is that the model is
> a little closer to the measurement, but still far enough away to look for
> other issues.
>
> The 5" number comes from a paper at one of the ACES conferences (Applied
> Computational Electromagnetics Society). I'll look it up later today and
> post the reference.
>
> Gary
> K9AY
> _________
>
>> K9AY:
>>
>>> This is easily explained by uncertainty in choosing an equivalent
>> diameter "solid wire" for
>> the 25G tower (I used 5 inches).
>>
>> That sounds too small. Here's the formula I used to model
>> my 160 vertical made of Rohn 45:
>>
>> http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Antennaware/2002-05/msg00001.html
>>
>> Equivalent Cylindrical Diameter = 2 * CUBEROOT [(D * F^2)/2]
>>
>> where D = tube diameter and F = Face width. For Rohn 45, D = 1.25"
>> and F = 18", so cylindrical diameter equivalent = 11.7446"
>>
>> This turned out to be very accurate in predicting both the tap point
>> and capacitance needed for my shunt fed tower (and later a 3-el
>> parasitic array using the tower as the driven element). I don't have
>> the tube diameter for Rohn 25 handy to actually go through the
>> formula but think the equivalent diameter might be closer to 8" (just
>> mentally scaling the result above).
>>
>> 73, Bill W4ZV
>
> _______________________________________________
> Antennaware mailing list
> Antennaware@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/antennaware
_______________________________________________
Antennaware mailing list
Antennaware@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/antennaware
|