Thus spoke Tom Hammond:
>
> What if the guy who thinks you're a dupe has you in his log on
> 12/07 (the date when you did NOT work him) and he (really) works
> you again on 12/08 as a courtesy to you because you say he's not
> on YOUR log. Now, when he does a post-contest cleanup, his
> software marks the 12/08 Q as a DUPE and removes(!) it from his
> log.
The proper thing for your contest software to do is to mark it as a
dupe, give it 0 points, but leave it in the log. If your software is
actually removing dupes from the log, you have a problem. This is why
you will see people posting summary results for SS (for example) where
the QSO total is greater than half the points claimed (every QSO being
worth two points) - there are dupes in the log. This is perfectly OK,
so long as you don't try to claim points for more than one of the
contacts.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth E. Harker "Vox Clamantis in Deserto" kharker@cs.utexas.edu
University of Texas at Austin Amateur Radio Callsign: KM5FA
Department of the Computer Sciences President, UT Amateur Radio Club
Taylor Hall TAY 2.124 Maintainer of the Linux Laptop Home Page
Austin, TX 78712-1188 USA http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|