Subject: | [CQ-Contest] SO2R |
---|---|
From: | rrossi@btv.ibm.com (Ron D. Rossi) |
Date: | Fri Jun 2 16:39:03 2000 |
>>>"Bill Turner" said: > > It's interesting that the two-radio guys are the most vociferous about > having only one category. Sort of like the Indy cars wanting to race > against everybody. I have never operated SO2R and feel it should NOT be in a different category. I will try it sooner or later though. I distinctly reside in the camp that SO2R is a lone operator striving to maximize contacts with skill and station improvements. I disagree that SO2R does not enhance general station effectiveness. It is a very short step from SO2R to 2O2R which could be useful in an emergency. -- 73 de KK1L...ron (kk1l@arrl.net) <>< QTH: Jericho, Vermont My page: http://www.qsl.net/kk1l -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] SO2R investment., Barry Kutner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] SO2R NOT a new category, Bill Turner |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Re SO2R: MBr, 2Br, 1Br, 0Br, ScBr, Guy Olinger, K2AV |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] SO2R, Mitchell, Tim T.K. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |