| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] SO2R |
|---|---|
| From: | ly3ba@takas.lt (Gediminas Lucinskas) |
| Date: | Fri Jun 2 23:32:04 2000 |
>I disagree that SO2R does not enhance general station effectiveness. It is a >very short step from SO2R to 2O2R which could be useful in an emergency. > >-- >73 de KK1L...ron (kk1l@arrl.net) <>< It's even shorter way to SO2R/2PC/2signals on 2 B at the same time.... The best way I can see is to allow two categories for SOAB- 1) a la M/S - 10 min on the same band + QSY to another single band during the same 10 min to pick up new Multiplier. 2) a la M/M - One op + as many TX as you are able to handle with the help of modern rig/software. 73 de Gedas,LY3BA -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Re SO2R: MBr, 2Br, 1Br, 0Br, ScBr, Guy Olinger, K2AV |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] SO2R NOT a new category, Robert Shohet |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] SO2R, Richard Gelber |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] SO2R, Fred Laun K3ZO |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |