CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP WEST/SOUTH/EAST etc.

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP WEST/SOUTH/EAST etc.
From: "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:07:13 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree with KQ2M that contests should only be on CW.  Or at least that's
what I think he's saying here....

:)

N5OT

> W1 and W8 at a "slight" disadvantage in the NAQP SSB?    I DON'T THINK SO!
>
> When a statement this silly is made then it is definitely time for some
> meaningful discussion!
>
> 1) The disparity between W1/W8 and other areas is exacerbated during
HIGHER
> RATE contests, which means NAQP SSB score disparities are greater than
NAQP
> CW.
>
> Why?
>
>   A) More guys operate SSB than CW and
>   B) Most people talk faster than send CW and
>   C) Loud guys on SSB get better and clearer frequencies to work other
loud
> guys as compared to some
>       W1 who is maybe S3 on backscatter when trying to work all the other
S3
> North East guys that W4,
>       W5, W6, and some other areas may be hearing S9++.  Guess who gets to
> run lots of guys on a pretty
>       clear frequency?  It sure isn't the W1!  This disadvantage is LESS
on
> CW as compared to SSB.
>   D) Rates are MUCH higher for the 10 hour period in NAQP SSB vs NAQP CW..
>
> The math is real simple.  The bigger the advantage you have x 10 hours,
the
> bigger the difference in score.
>
> NAQP SSB has much higher rates than NAQP CW so any propagation advantage x
> HIGHER rate, means a LARGER difference in score.
>
> Compare the average of the Top-Ten NAQP SSB scores vs. the Top-Ten W1/W8
> scores.
>
> Then compare the average of the Top-Ten NAQP CW scores vs. the Top-Ten
W1/W8
> scores.
>
> I am willing to bet that over a few years,  the W1/W8 areas are much
closer
> to the top score in NAQPCW as compared to NAQPSSB.  Perhaps someone
already
> has calculated this and can post this info.
>
> I am equally sure that if the level of activity in NAQP CW increases
> dramatically, and/or everyone QRS's then the Top Ten NAQP SSB guys will
find
> a way to increase their score that much more during NAQP CW as compared to
> W1/W8.
>
> The same disparity holds true in a DX contest.
>
> If my CQWW DX SSB European run rate goes from 60/hr to 100/hour x 20 hours
> of run does the W6 top score get closer or further away from my score?
> 1-year anomalies aside, the West Coast score clearly suffers by
comparison.
>
> Am I complaining about the score disparities between W1 and other areas in
> NAQP?  NOT AT ALL!  It is what it is and that's just fine.  Some day when
> K4XS or N6NF or whomever makes 2,000 q's in NAQP SSB, I will be even more
> amazed and appreciative of their score then, than I am now, even if the
top
> W1 is left even further in the dust.
>
> But I just can't imagine how it is possible for anyone to even think that
> W1/W8 is only at a slight score disadvantage in NAQPSSB compared to other
> areas of the country!  The numbers tell the story!
>
> 73
> Bob KQ2M
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>     The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
>        http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>