Re: [CQ-Contest] Contests without no-packet operation

[Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>]

Well said. I could not agree more.
Keith GM4YXI (GM7V)
Small towers, SO2R (but inept), packetless shack


> Comparing packet to big beams and towers is nonsense.  The bottom line  is
> there is only one person operating and finding stations at my big towered
> station......me.  In packet assisted, it is a multi-op no matter how 
> you  slice it.
>  I heard the same baloney about two radio  operation......still only one op,
> regardless of the number of radios.
>
> I have no problems with other stations using packet, as long as they admit
> using it when scores are submitted.  If it increases their 
> enjoyment,  great.
> It's a shame though, that we have to change the rules by making  everyone in
> the packet class, because some dirtbags cheat.
>
> Bill K4XS........big towers, SO2R and packetless  contesting
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


------------
Dr Keith M Kerr,
Consultant and Clinical Senior Lecturer,
Department of Pathology,
Aberdeen University Medical School
and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary,
Foresterhill,
Aberdeen,
Scotland, UK,
AB25  2ZD
Tel 01224 552414   Fax  01224 663002
k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest