To: | "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters |
From: | "RiC" <Wo4o@Home-Sweet-Loans.com> |
Date: | Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:04:56 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Dave Sumner says your check is in the mail. (Just my lame attempt at being
funny...) What you've assembled is a good argument for the ARRL concerning their support of contesting and the facts should speak for themselves -- but some believe ignorance is bliss -- always good to have a preponderance of the evidence and I think you've done well by your compilation.) We can't have everything, nor should we expect it. It can be worthwhile to put up a good fight for what you think you need but one should pick battles carefully. I don't want to die on just any hill. 73 Ric Wo4o ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com> To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 3:47 PM Subject: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters There seems to be a lot of ARRL-bashing on the list recently. While
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Complaining !!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Yuri VE3DZ |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Complaining !!!!!!!!!!!!!!, K0HB |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters, Kenneth E. Harker |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters, Bill Turner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |