CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters

To: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>,"CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:15:27 -00
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> There seems to be a lot of ARRL-bashing on the list recently.  While
> I was very disappointed at the decision to remove line scores from QST
myself
> (and made sure my Division Director understood my point of view,) ARRL is
> by no means anti-contesting, as some have suggested.

Ken, your points are well taken.

I've seen a lot of sentiment expressed here about the decision to quit
printing line scores in QST, but except for the gentleman from Arizona
trying to organize a boycott, I've seen very little "ARRL bashing".

I'm a lifelong supporter of ARRL, but I reserve the right (as you do) to
express my disappointment about some of their penny-wise/pound-foolish
financial decisions.

73, de Hans, K0HB







_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>