CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] How about ditching ARRL DX top 10 completely?

To: <wally@el-soft.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] How about ditching ARRL DX top 10 completely?
From: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:55:36 +0300
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Us here in North Eastern Europe clearly must be allowed
a score multiplier.
The multiplier would be over the contest period averaged K.

Some would prefer to have the score increased to the
power of A but I would settle with average of K multiplier.


73,
Jukka OH6LI

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of ext Valeri
> Stefanov
> Sent: 07 April, 2005 19:40
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] How about ditching ARRL DX top 10 completely?
> 
> 
> I would also suggest separate scoring for Western / Central 
> and Eastern
> Europe for ARRL :-))).
> Europeans are main DX group of participants in this one.
> 
> Now we are NOT interested at all to participate seriously in 
> ARRL from South
> Eastern Europe for easily understood reasons :-)))  Same 
> differences as
> between East Coast and West Coast refering proximity to Europe.
> 
> A 100 W and a dipole UK station has the same signal in US as  
> LZ with full
> legal power and phased verticals on 80m for example.
> 
> That is why ARRL is not a priority contest for LZ9W M/M Team 
> here :-((.
> 
> 73 de Wally LZ2CJ
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>