CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King at K4XS

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King at K4XS
From: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 21:57:50 EDT
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Not to diss any of the logging programs, but the bottom line is does your 
program do what you want it to do?  I have been using CT and NA when they were 
shareware in the 80s.  Both do what I want them to do and I have logged on them 
so long, I could do them in my sleep.  My primary choice is CT, but I like NA 
too.

My guess is most of the old farts (me included) are using CT, from force of 
habit.  It's like a comfortable old pair of slippers.  My other guess is most 
of the new guys who don't remember when ten meters was a bottomless source of 
QSOs from the all the novices, are using TR and some of the others.

Bill K4XS
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King at K4XS, Cqtestk4xs <=